Obamathematics

October 13, 2008
By 3 comments

Barack Obama has taken the old adage of buying votes with the voter’s money to a new level by applying a simple form of mathematics. The equation states that you can afford to alienate 5% of the voting public by promising to use their money to pay the remaining 95% for their votes. This may sound somewhat dishonest but if you couch it in the rhetoric of taxing the wealthy to help the middle class it becomes much more palatable.

Obama also employs the new English to go along with the new math. Once again he evokes the 95% figure and says that this percentage will get a tax reduction. If roughly 45 million tax filers have no tax liability, according to the IRS, how can they reduce their income tax?  Well you have to use the new math and the new English and then it all works out. Tax reduction is the new welfare.This must be what Obama calls education reform.

Now I’ll admit, I still believe that there is a golden rule that suggests the person with the gold makes the rules. If the top 5% were clever enough to become the top 5% I’m thinking maybe they will be clever enough to keep their money. The math is fairly easy. Profit is what you take in less what you pay out. If what you pay out equals operating costs plus taxes and taxes go up then you have to reduce operating costs to maintain profit.

I’ll put this question to all the 95% that will be getting money from the 5% (the 5% already know). Where will the reduction in operating costs come from? Will the auto maker buy less steel or the bakery buy less flour, or the furniture manufacturer by less wood? To do that would reduce the number of products that they sell. What they might do is hire less help or lay-off non-essential workers. You know what non-essential workers are; they’re the people that were brought in to grow the company and add more jobs.

Of course there is another way for the 5% to maintain their profit. The simply raise prices. It may not be a good idea in an economic downturn, but it is a way to balance the equation. The farmer adds a little, the dairy adds a little to what the farmer adds, the grocery store adds a little to what the dairy adds and you pay a little plus a little plus a little more.

So who in this new Obamathematics really pays for his new math? Well I guess that would be you and me. What’s more, now we add the 5% to the tax food chain. In Obamathematics they collect the tax from you in the form of higher prices and the government collects it from them if the unrepentant and reformed politicians aren’t convinced by lobbyists and special interests not to collect it.

5% of the people of the United States of America are being called upon to support our economy, the troubled world economies, and 95% of the tax filers. If I were one of them, I’d take my bat and ball and go home. If I could afford to do all that I probably could afford to just say no.

Here is something to keep in mind when you enter the voting booth this November. “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.”

vaso link

3 Responses to Obamathematics

  1. S.A. Andrews on October 13, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Great post. Until the recent collapse of stocks, the average U.S. citizen would suffer under obamathematics. Mutual funds generate capital gains taxes, anyone taking profit on a mutual fund would be taxed more under obama. That may explain the flight from stocks, the smart people are getting out for two reasons, getting liquid and avoiding the future tax increases.
    obama is a communist, his plans are all socialistic. The average person has fallen into the “tyranny of the majority” group written about by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. Populism is winning and will continue as long as people believe they can get something for nothing.
    As example of our future, Tyson Foods, “the chicken people” recently opened two plants in China for production to the Asian markets. Long term they will have little need to produce in the U.S. market when taxes reach the breaking point.
    Many financial institutions will be nationalized, so small specialized companies will spring up in tax havens. The flight from the U.S. will be dramatic under obama.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. jay on October 18, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    I wish we could divide statesi into low[REP} +high[LIB] states and let the rewards be the evidence.I have no doubt that even liberals would move tp low tax states quickly.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Lonely Conservative on October 18, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    Jay, they do that already, which is why previously red states are turning blue and purple. They ruin their own state, can’t stand the high taxes and liberal policies they voted for and move to low tax states en masse, thereby ruining those states.

    Red states should have their own border control. Keep the libs out!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Make a Blogger Smile

Blogs4Mitt.com

Sponsor

Shop Target!

Shop Daily Deals at Target.com. Always Free Shipping.

Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Archives

My Latest Tweets

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

stat counter

Zilla Award Winner

Larwyn’s Linx

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Review this blog

Review http://lonelyconservative.com on alexa.com

Visit the Finger Lakes

fingerlakes rentals

Thanks for Voting! 1st Place!

Memeorandum

Top Economics Sites

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin