Rush Limbaugh published an open letter to President Obama in The Wall Street Journal urging The One to keep the airwaves free. Rush isn’t about to take this Fairness Doctrine business lying down.
Dear President Obama,
I have a straightforward question, which I hope you will answer in a straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through a variety of contrivances, such as “local content,” “diversity of ownership,” and “public interest” rules — all of which are designed to appeal to populist sentiments but, as you know, are the death knell of talk radio and the AM band?
You have singled me out directly, admonishing members of Congress not to listen to my show. Bill Clinton has since chimed in, complaining about the lack of balance on radio. And a number of members of your party, in and out of Congress, are forming a chorus of advocates for government control over radio content. This is both chilling and ominous.
As a former president of the Harvard Law Review and a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, you are more familiar than most with the purpose of the Bill of Rights: to protect the citizen from the possible excesses of the federal government. The First Amendment says, in part, that “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” The government is explicitly prohibited from playing a role in refereeing among those who speak or seek to speak. We are, after all, dealing with political speech — which, as the Framers understood, cannot be left to the government to police.
When I began my national talk show in 1988, no one, including radio industry professionals, thought my syndication would work. There were only about 125 radio stations programming talk. And there were numerous news articles and opinion pieces predicting the fast death of the AM band, which was hemorrhaging audience and revenue to the FM band. Some blamed the lower-fidelity AM signals. But the big issue was broadcast content. It is no accident that the AM band was dying under the so-called Fairness Doctrine, which choked robust debate about important issues because of its onerous attempts at rationing the content of speech.
After the Federal Communications Commission abandoned the Fairness Doctrine in the mid-1980s, Congress passed legislation to reinstitute it. When President Reagan vetoed it, he declared that “This doctrine . . . requires Federal officials to supervise the editorial practices of broadcasters in an effort to ensure that they provide coverage of controversial issues and a reasonable opportunity for the airing of contrasting viewpoints of those issues. This type of content-based regulation by the Federal Government is . . . antagonistic to the freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment. . . . History has shown that the dangers of an overly timid or biased press cannot be averted through bureaucratic regulation, but only through the freedom and competition that the First Amendment sought to guarantee.”
Today the number of radio stations programming talk is well over 2,000. In fact, there are thousands of stations that air tens of thousands of programs covering virtually every conceivable topic and in various languages. The explosion of talk radio has created legions of jobs and billions in economic value. Not bad for an industry that only 20 years ago was moribund. Content, content, content, Mr. President, is the reason for the huge turnaround of the past 20 years, not “funding” or “big money,” as Mr. Clinton stated. And not only has the AM band been revitalized, but there is competition from other venues, such as Internet and satellite broadcasting. It is not an exaggeration to say that today, more than ever, anyone with a microphone and a computer can broadcast their views. And thousands do. Read full letter.
It’s doubtful The One will grace Rush with a straightforward answer.
On a related note, Senator Jim DeMint is attempting to force a vote in the Senate on this issue.
February 19, 2009 – WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), chairman of the Senate Steering Committee, announced that he will offer the Broadcaster Freedom Act (S.34) as an amendment to the D.C. Voting Rights bill next week. The Broadcaster Freedom Act, introduced by U.S. Senators DeMint and John Thune (R-South Dakota), prevents the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, which would suppress free speech by requiring the government to monitor political views and decide what constitutes fair political discourse.
This should get interesting. An assault on Americans’ First Amendment rights isn’t very popular and this move could possibly bring more attention to this issue. Let’s hope Senators DeMint and Thune address all of the questions raised by Rush Limbaugh.










[...] … is questionable to say the least. In 2006, Rush was stopped at an airport en route home Dear Mr. President – Keep the Airwaves Free – lonelyconservative.com 02/20/2009 Rush Limbaugh published an open letter to President Obama in [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
0
[...] Lonely Conservative published Rush Limbaugh’s WSJ letter to the jr. admin. from IL concerning the Fairness Doctrine. Both the Lonely Conservative and I have [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
0
A big H/T to the controversial Mr. Rush Limbaugh for his letter to the One. Rush stated in one letter by accident, what the entire Congress of these United States failed to do for the entire debate over the “porkulus package” and managed to totally debunk the fairness doctrine at the same time.
The letter reveals the rule for what it really is, a totally worthless point of control that does nothing but STOMP on the First Amendment, SMOTHER free enterprise with more regulation and possible liability and generally insults the intelligence of every American.
The letter continues with a few lessons that our Congress could really use. The American Public at Large is neither stupid nor helpless. A well informed public is the backbone of Liberty and the enemy of tyranny. It really makes me wonder which side our Politicians are on?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Val – You said “A well informed public is the backbone of Liberty and the enemy of tyranny. It really makes me wonder which side our Politicians are on?”
I don’t wonder at all. They don’t want us to be informed.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
[...] You can find Rush Limbaugh here You can find the letter at the WSJ You can see more on this subject at The Lonely Conservative [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I shared this with a friend, useful info!
Like or Dislike:
0
0