I try not to hate. Hate eats you up inside and it’s generally unhealthy for the hater. But when it comes to pedophiles, I have to admit, I kind of hate them. Apparently, democrats in Congress don’t. The priorities of these folks are so royally screwed up, it’s breathtaking.
THE HOUSE APPROVED federal hate crimes legislation (H.R. 1913), by a decisive 249- 175 margin. But in a shocking move, Democrats killed language that would have excluded pedophiles from receiving protections afforded in the measure. Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) added the amendment during Judiciary Committee hearings, which stated that sexual orientation in the bill specifically be defined as not including pedophiles.
According to Ted Pike, director of the National Prayer Network, Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) objected, saying that King’s amendment was “unnecessary and inflammatory.” Ms. Baldwin claimed that sexual orientation, as defined by the Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990, means consensual heterosexual or homosexual sex. That definition, she claimed, is sufficient to exclude pedophiles, Pike added. Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (Ill.) then quickly cut off debate-before any conservatives on the committee could respond-and called for a vote.
“When Republicans objected,” said Pike, “Conyers said he had not noticed them wanting to debate Baldwin’s position, an absurd, unbelievable lie.” Pedophilia is a problem, contends Pike, and is something that should be addressed in this legislation to avoid protecting those who break the law. It is inexplicable why Democrats on the committee would seek to provide federal protections to homosexual individuals and groups that promote pedophilia, while “straight” pedophiles would remain without specially protected status, punishable under conventional law.
During the last several minutes of the hearing, Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-Texas) tried to object to the committee’s burying of language that would have excluded child-molesting homosexuals, but it was a lost cause.
The Judiciary voted to pass the hate bill without protective language so that any homosexual can claim special protection even when it comes to children. What other forms of dangerous practices will be afforded federal protections under the law? Before the debate was ended, Gohmert wondered aloud if parents, who attacked a homosexual pedophile who had been preying on their child, could now be prosecuted under federal hate crime laws.
Says Pike: “If the hate bill threat has not moved you to pick up your phone and protest to Congress, the fact that H.R. 1913 protects even pedophiles should cause you to react with outrage.”
Call 1-877 851-6437 toll free and tell your Senators in Congress to vote against this bill.
[...] can’t be included in the most recent hate crimes bill that passed the house (H.R. 1913), but apparently pedophiles can can covered! Democrats killed language in the H.R. 1913 hate crimes bill that would have excluded pedophiles [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Can anyone still try to convince me that there is still hope for this country?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This bill is a crime against all Americans. Whether one is gay or straight, this gives protection to specific groups who do tremendous harm to us all. The language of the bill is so non-specific that anyone can claim something is a sexual orientation and have protection while the victims are charged with a felony. It is not surprising that the democrats want to pass this bill, but in the end it will cost them. God is just and those who spit in His face usually wind up in deep trouble with Him.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
No body will read this I’m sure, but how does not specifically banning this bill from covering pedophiles differ from not including a ban for covering child murderers? Some people get off on death. This bill CAN’T protect any behavior that is already illegal and when the specific definition of what is considered a valid relation ship under this and all bills was laid out almost 20 years ago?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0