An Economics History Lesson

September 22, 2009
By 2 comments

Arthur Laffer provided a little economics history lesson in this morning’s Wall Street Journal. Those in Washington, DC can’t seem to learn the lessons from the Great Depression. If the democrats succeed with their plans for health care and cap and trade, could we be looking at another Great Depression?

In 1930-31, during the Hoover administration and in the midst of an economic collapse, there was a very slight increase in tax rates on personal income at both the lowest and highest brackets. The corporate tax rate was also slightly increased to 12% from 11%. But beginning in 1932 the lowest personal income tax rate was raised to 4% from less than one-half of 1% while the highest rate was raised to 63% from 25%. (That’s not a misprint!) The corporate rate was raised to 13.75% from 12%. All sorts of Federal excise taxes too numerous to list were raised as well. The highest inheritance tax rate was also raised in 1932 to 45% from 20% and the gift tax was reinstituted with the highest rate set at 33.5%.

But the tax hikes didn’t stop there. In 1934, during the Roosevelt administration, the highest estate tax rate was raised to 60% from 45% and raised again to 70% in 1935. The highest gift tax rate was raised to 45% in 1934 from 33.5% in 1933 and raised again to 52.5% in 1935. The highest corporate tax rate was raised to 15% in 1936 with a surtax on undistributed profits up to 27%. In 1936 the highest personal income tax rate was raised yet again to 79% from 63%—a stifling 216% increase in four years. Finally, in 1937 a 1% employer and a 1% employee tax was placed on all wages up to $3,000.

Because of the number of states and their diversity I’m going to aggregate all state and local taxes and express them as a percentage of GDP. This measure of state tax policy truly understates the state and local tax contribution to the tragedy we call the Great Depression, but I’m sure the reader will get the picture. In 1929, state and local taxes were 7.2% of GDP and then rose to 8.5%, 9.7% and 12.3% for the years 1930, ’31 and ’32 respectively.

The damage caused by high taxation during the Great Depression is the real lesson we should learn. A government simply cannot tax a country into prosperity. If there were one warning I’d give to all who will listen, it is that U.S. federal and state tax policies are on an economic crash trajectory today just as they were in the 1930s. Net legislated state-tax increases as a percentage of previous year tax receipts are at 3.1%, their highest level since 1991; the Bush tax cuts are set to expire in 2011; and additional taxes to pay for health-care and the proposed cap-and-trade scheme are on the horizon.

In addition to all of these tax issues, the U.S. in the early 1930s was on a gold standard where paper currency was legally convertible into gold. Both circulated in the economy as money. At the outset of the Great Depression people distrusted banks but trusted paper currency and gold. They withdrew deposits from banks, which because of a fractional reserve system caused a drop in the money supply in spite of a rising monetary base. The Fed really had little power to control either bank reserves or interest rates. …

Let’s see. President Obama has already fired the first shot in a trade war. The monetary base has been increased by over 100%. Bush’s tax cuts are set to expire. Democrats and Obama are chomping at the bit to pass expensive health care legislation. They’re pushing for cap and trade. Do you expect taxes not to go up? If you want free health care, are you willing to forego all the comforts of life you’re used to thanks to a  robust economy? No? Well you may not have a choice. Read up on the quality of life during the Great Depression - see if you’ll be able to afford your Starbucks latte, cable, internet connection, flat screen TV,  iPhone, and vehicle. Enjoy it while it lasts, because if the democrats have their way there’s a good chance you’ll lose it all.

vaso link

2 Responses to An Economics History Lesson

  1. ZORRO on September 22, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    All so true, and just in case these policies don’t quite destroy the economy, throw in protectionist trade policies just to make sure that the corpse doesn’t start wiggling again.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Sam Adams on September 22, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    I’m convinced. They actually want the system to break down.

    This will allow them to rebuild in the mold of a one world order.

    The price? Our Freedom and liberty.

    No? Guess what, go to a “free country.” Go ahead pick one: Germany? S.Korea?

    Germany: No such thing as Miranda rights. VAT tax up the ying yang.

    S. Korea: Beyond casual conversation, You DO NOT have the freedom to express a disagreement with the gov’t. This is one reason you’ll see college students stage protests.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Make a Blogger Smile

Blogs4Mitt.com

Sponsor

Shop Target!

Shop Daily Deals at Target.com. Always Free Shipping.

Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Archives

My Latest Tweets

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

stat counter

Zilla Award Winner

Larwyn’s Linx

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Review this blog

Review http://lonelyconservative.com on alexa.com

Visit the Finger Lakes

fingerlakes rentals

Thanks for Voting! 1st Place!

Memeorandum

Top Economics Sites

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin