Suddenly Nancy Pelosi is Concerned About Angry Rhetoric

September 17, 2009
By 7 comments

She’s just too much, that Nancy Pelosi. Peaceful protesters exercising their first amendment right to air grievances is suddenly dangerous. What, that whole racism canard isn’t working out? Less than a year ago dissent was patriotic, and now she fears violence? The only violence at town hall meetings and tea parties has been perpetrated by those on her side. She’d almost be believable if she hadn’t been spewing angry rhetoric herself while George W. Bush was president. The vitriol spewed against the man was commonplace. And did she cry when a film was released about the assassination of President Bush? Not that I could find.

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) responded:

“The Speaker is now likening genuine opposition to assassination. Such insulting rhetoric not only undermines the credibility of her office, but it underscores the desperate attempt by her party to divert attention away from a failing agenda,” Sessions said in a statement. “During one of the most important policy debates of our time, the American people have been completely abandoned by those elected representatives under her control. Voters are justifiably frustrated with Washington, and the Speaker’s verbal assault on voters accomplishes nothing other than furthering her reputation for being wildly out of touch with the American people.”

vaso link

7 Responses to Suddenly Nancy Pelosi is Concerned About Angry Rhetoric

  1. Lisa on September 18, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    I’m not sure that’s really Nancy. You could see parts of this woman’s face moving.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Sam Adams on September 18, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    First off: When I look at the video San Fran Nan ISN’T being emotional.

    Looks like she’s choking something she ate back down
    but NOT some emotional response. Otherwise it’s contrived.

    The lefties are best Uncivil and at worse antagonistic. They routinely call names and express vile ideas. They, the party of compassion, will “out” and subsequently ridicule a gay person if it suits them. (Yet it’she Religious Right that are “haters.”)

    Sorry Nan…just shut you pie hole and PLEASE go away.

    BTW: Harvey Milk was murdered by a DEMOCRAT, not an operative of the RNC or any right wing religious group. I’m not too keen on what Milk was all about, but I don’t endorse his unlawful either.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Sam Adams on September 18, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    …….at best….

    **Wish we could edit our posts**

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Lonely Conservative on September 18, 2009 at 3:31 pm

      I tried adding that feature but it screwed up my site. If a new plug in that isn’t corrupted becomes available I’ll add it.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Madalyn on September 18, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    Fancy Nancy was not crying. She said she was to garner sympathy. She has learned to lie with a straight face (before Botox) that trying to thrust a tear out of those dilated eyes has become second nature. Would you be able to cry if you spent 99% of your time with your head up Obama’s a**?
    Madalyn

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Sam Adams on September 18, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    I’m back.

    The more I look at that clip the more I say she’s NOT all emotional a choked up.

    She had to really take stock before she had the gall to preach about rhetoric and taking responsibility for one’ words.

    The Dems have been lying straight faced and are flat out called on it. The people see it (despite the efforts of the MSM) and are not too happy.

    Without playing the “counting game” tell me that the numbers in DC were not huge. That couples with the many local gatherings has got some of the Dems attention.

    I live near Seattle which is San Francisco North (ok, neck to neck with Portand) and LOT’S of libs this way are NOT pleased.

    Calling them racists really got pissed them off too………Opps!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Nancy on September 19, 2009 at 12:30 am

    Nancy P is not fit to lead the House.. she’s pathetic fraud and shill. She stood by happily watching the radical lefties attack delegates in Minneapolis at the RNC Convention… They were Brownshirts in every way…even spraying something on delegates and some were found making molotovs in hotel room….didn’t hear a peep out of ol Nancy…she had no problem with anti-war nuts laying in streets and blocking traffic…radical, foaming at the mouth nuts…she actually praised them…she watched for 8 years as Geo Bush was attacked…websites lined the internet talking of killing him and calling him every dictators name one can imagine…accusing him of every ridiculous crime one could imagine… as Nancy looked on with pride… She’s a hack and needs to go if the democrats want any legitimacy at all… I cannot believe they would allow a kook like her to lead the House. And if that isn’t bad enough…her acting abilities were ridiculous…who could be fooled by that lame display…Nancy don’t go away mad…just go away!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Shop Target!

Shop Daily Deals at Target.com. Always Free Shipping.

Content here is free, but tips are greatly appreciated

Sponsor

support this site – visit our advertisers

Ted Cruz for US Senate!

Visit the Finger Lakes

fingerlakes rentals

My Latest Tweets

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

Larwyn’s Linx

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Search this blog

Archives

Memeorandum

Start your Amazon search here

stat counter

Site Meter

Secure Your Website

Review this blog

Review http://lonelyconservative.com on alexa.com

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin