Below is a Fox News report on the FCC’s plan to regulat the internet. Gee, what could go wrong? They can’t even distribute enough flu shots to Americans, and they want to control the internet? It’s been nice knowing you, dear readers! Even the communications workers union is against the idea.
Reuters has the full story with updates. It doesn’t sound good, especially this: “Draft rule would allow for ‘reasonable’ net management.” Who defines reasonable?
U.S. communications regulators voted unanimously Thursday to support an open Internet rule that would prevent telecom network operators from barring or blocking content based on the revenue it generates.The proposed rule now goes to the public for comment until Jan. 14, after which the Federal Communications Commissions will review the feedback and possibly seek more comment. A final rule is not expected until the spring of next year.
“I am pleased that there is broad agreement inside the commission that we should move forward with a healthy and transparent process on an open Internet,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said.
The vote came despite a flurry of lobbying against the net neutrality rule by telecommunications service providers like AT&T Inc (T.N), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ.N) and Qwest Communications International Inc (Q.N), which say it would strip them of the ability to manage their networks effectively and would stifle innovation and competition.
The rule would prevent operators from discriminating against any legal content a third party wants to deliver to consumers on their networks, though it allows for “reasonable” network management to unclog congestion, clear viruses and spam, and block unlawful content like child pornography or the transfer of pirated content.
The full FCC slate of three Democrats, led by Genachowski, and two Republicans voted in favor of issuing a proposed network neutrality rule for public comment.
But the two Republicans, Robert McDowell and Meredith Attwell Baker, did express concern with the content of the rule, saying they do not share the majority’s view that the Internet is showing breaks and cracks and that the government is the best tool to fix it. They also questioned whether the FCC has the legal authority to regulate the Internet network.
Nonetheless, the vote was 5-to-0 for proceeding with the rulemaking, and 3-to-2 for approving the notice’s language in its entirety, said Jen Howard, an FCC spokesman.
I have a question, if those two republicans are so concerned, why did they vote for it?
I refer again to my reply , above about banana republics. More of the same, on the internet. Next will be talk radio.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0