Comments on: Obama’s Most Frequent House Guest: We Need to ‘Spread the Wealth’ http://lonelyconservative.com/2009/11/obamas-most-frequent-house-guest-we-need-to-spread-the-wealth/ Observations from a conservative in a blue state. With a little help from my friends! Sat, 26 May 2012 18:13:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: ZORROhttp://lonelyconservative.com/2009/11/obamas-most-frequent-house-guest-we-need-to-spread-the-wealth/comment-page-1/#comment-13018 ZORRO Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:34:26 +0000 http://www.lonelyconservative.com/?p=12773#comment-13018 Does this thug have to check his brass knuckles at the door when he enters the WH? Does this thug have to check his brass knuckles at the door when he enters the WH?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Soldier4110http://lonelyconservative.com/2009/11/obamas-most-frequent-house-guest-we-need-to-spread-the-wealth/comment-page-1/#comment-13017 Soldier4110 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:22:37 +0000 http://www.lonelyconservative.com/?p=12773#comment-13017 The Obama Administration provides the best last-ditch effort to save private sector unions. The federal government has 37% of its workers in unions, but the private sector has fewer than 10% of its workers in unions. In New Hampshire this week, the non-union workers scored a victory in that they will be allowed to bid for federal contracts without "union" rules and dues that had been imposed by the Obama Administration. In research I had done a couple months ago, I found that unions are historically a tool of Communism and revolution. In working per my job with some unions, I have come to the conclusion that a fine line must be walked between unions and employers......and not every employer needs to be unionized. Yes, the unions have contributed to the loss of productive jobs in the U.S. [which is a biggie], but we certainly don't want to go back to Haymarket episodes of the 19th century.....or the Carnegie strikers' deaths of the early 20th century. I can't think of any recent President who paid homage to the unions like the Obama Administration. It is definitely too much and way over the top. It wouldn't be so horrifying if we didn't all know the aggressiveness of union tactics. The Obama Administration provides the best last-ditch effort to save private sector unions. The federal government has 37% of its workers in unions, but the private sector has fewer than 10% of its workers in unions. In New Hampshire this week, the non-union workers scored a victory in that they will be allowed to bid for federal contracts without “union” rules and dues that had been imposed by the Obama Administration.

In research I had done a couple months ago, I found that unions are historically a tool of Communism and revolution. In working per my job with some unions, I have come to the conclusion that a fine line must be walked between unions and employers……and not every employer needs to be unionized. Yes, the unions have contributed to the loss of productive jobs in the U.S. [which is a biggie], but we certainly don’t want to go back to Haymarket episodes of the 19th century…..or the Carnegie strikers’ deaths of the early 20th century.

I can’t think of any recent President who paid homage to the unions like the Obama Administration. It is definitely too much and way over the top. It wouldn’t be so horrifying if we didn’t all know the aggressiveness of union tactics.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dominiquehttp://lonelyconservative.com/2009/11/obamas-most-frequent-house-guest-we-need-to-spread-the-wealth/comment-page-1/#comment-13015 Dominique Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:56:49 +0000 http://www.lonelyconservative.com/?p=12773#comment-13015 This guy just makes me want to vomit. Why doesn't he spread his own wealth if he is so concerned? This guy just makes me want to vomit. Why doesn’t he spread his own wealth if he is so concerned?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>