ClimateGate has been out there for weeks now. One would think that if the scientists were innocent their protectors would have by now come up with some fanciful way to excuse their bad behavior. Plus, with the media focused on the transgressions of Tiger Woods they’ve had even more time to think up something to explain the inexplicable. But they’re scientifically and morally bankrupt. They’re power hungry thieves who should be prosecuted, or at least sued. There is no plausible excuse and they know it. Calling for the prosecution of the whistleblower is just a distraction and they know it. So does the media, but the media plays along.
So, what’s an international climate scientist to do when confronted with tough questions? Why, have the journalist with integrity removed. You didn’t think he’d answer the questions did you, silly?
Big Government has the story (video below):
McAleer, a veteran journalist and film maker, has recently made a documentary “Not Evil Just Wrong’ which takes a sceptical look at the science and politics behind Global Warming concerns.
He asked Professor Schneider about his opinions on Climategate – where leaked emails have revealed that a senior British professor deleted data and encouraged colleagues to do likewise if it contradicted their belief in Global Warming.
Professor Phil Jones, the head of Britain’s Climate Research Unit, has temporarily stood down pending an investigation into the scandal.
Professor Schneider, who is a senior member of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said he would not comment on emails that may have been incomplete or edited.
During some testy exchanges with McAleer, UN officials and Professor Schneider’s assistants twice tried to cut short McAleer’s question.
However as the press conference drew to a close Professor Schneider’s assistant called armed UN security guards to the room. They held McAleer and aggressively ordered cameraman Ian Foster to stop filming. The guard threatened to take away the camera and expel the film crew from the conference if they did not obey his instructions to stop filming Professor Schneider.
The guard demanded to look at the film crews press credentials and refused to allow them to film until Professor Schneider left the room.
McAleer said he was disappointed by Professor Schneider’s behaviour.“It was a press conference. Climategate is a major story – it goes to the heart of the Global Warming debate by calling into question the scientific data and the integrity of many scientists involved.” …..
Via Memeorandum











Beautiful! If you don’t shut up, I’ll put a gun barrel in your face. That’s historically how the left always imposes itself in the end. The left is the element of force and hate, and if you disagree with them, they’ll use anything, and I mean anything to silence you. Andrew Klaven does a really good monologue of “Shut Up” on PJTV. It’s hilariously truthful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWHgUE9AD4s
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Global Warming!-IS- Human/ Industrial Waste!
The best indisputable SCIENCE example that should be the #1 item on the Copenhagen Agenda would be the toxic waste dump, the size of Texas, 900 miles off of the United States and Canadian West Coast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GreatPacificGarbagePatch
That is a Big SCIENCE problem with no dedicated U.S SCIENCE and INNOVATION DEPARTMENT to address the issue. The U.S (or Canada) has not even sent out a SCIENCE research vessel to evaluate this ecological disaster; neither country wants to take the responsibility for the industrial/human pollution or even acknowledge its existence.
No Profit-No Action!-No SCIENCE! Will the World Trade Organization and the New Industrial World Order address the issue? Where is their World Department of SCIENCE?
Can the problem be solved with SCIENCE? Probably so, Americans are very ingenious primarily because we were raised with the compliments of Freedom and Democracy and are free thinking individuals. We could probably figure a way to clean up the mess and possibly make a profit doing so.
We can do nothing until we have a DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE that is free to address SCIENCE and to develop the advancement of SCIENCE. (Yes, for the sake of humanity; SCIENCE FIRST.)
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You’re schizophrenic argument is laughable, but it’s what we have to politely put up with. Wake up and smell the toast burning, it’s a contrived monetary scam and the facts are fast traveling. Your religion does not exist. The earth has experienced many Ice Ages and warming trends all before human industrialization and will again. Go figure. You’re riddled with guilt of your own for anything. You place all other above human. You and your kind are rouges to our species. Almost pathetic you are Lawrence, but in all seriousness, get checked; for humanity’s sake.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
This is what passes as “dialog” with these thugs of the left wing. Just another typical example.
Like or Dislike:
0
0