Ouch! Karl Rove disputed the “solid B+” President Obama gave himself on his first year in office. He pulled no punches. And he’s right. Obama has cheapened the office.
Barack Obama has won a place in history with the worst ratings of any president at the end of his first year: 49% approve and 46% disapprove of his job performance in the latest USA Today/Gallup Poll.
There are many factors that explain it, including weakness abroad, an unprecedented spending binge at home, and making a perfectly awful health-care plan his signature domestic initiative. But something else is happening.
Mr. Obama has not governed as the centrist, deficit-fighting, bipartisan consensus builder he promised to be. And his promise to embody a new kind of politics—free of finger-pointing, pettiness and spin—was a mirage. He has cheapened his office with needless attacks on his predecessor.
Consider Mr. Obama’s comment in his interview this past Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that the Bush administration made a mistake in speaking in “a triumphant sense about war.”
This was a slap at every president who rallied the nation in dark moments, including Franklin D. Roosevelt (“With confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the inevitable triumph”); Woodrow Wilson (“Right is more precious than peace and we shall fight for the things which we have always carried nearest our hearts”); and John F. Kennedy (“Any hostile move anywhere in the world against the safety and freedom of peoples to whom we are committed . . . will be met by whatever action is needed”).
This kind of attack gives Mr. Obama’s words a slippery quality. For example, he voted for the bank rescue plan in September 2008 and praised it during the campaign. Yet on Dec. 8 at the Brookings Institution, Mr. Obama called it “flawed” and blamed “the last administration” for launching it “hastily.”
Really? Bush Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and New York Fed President Timothy Geithner designed it. If it was “flawed,” why did Mr. Obama later nominate Mr. Bernanke to a second term as Fed chairman and make Mr. Geithner his Treasury secretary?
Mr. Obama also claimed at Brookings that he prevented “a second Great Depression” by confronting the financial crisis “largely without the help” of Republicans. Yet his own Treasury secretary suggests otherwise. In a Dec. 9 letter, Mr. Geithner admitted that since taking office, the Obama administration had “committed about $7 billion to banks, much of which went to small institutions.” That compares to $240 billion the Bush administration lent banks. Does Mr. Obama really believe his additional $7 billion forestalled “the potential collapse of our financial system”? …
Be sure to read the whole thing to find out just how many deceptive comments our Dear Leader has made.
Man, Rove is good at this kind of stuff, LOL
And indisputable… I love it
Polls fully support what he’s saying, too- especially re. independents, who’ve almost completely dumped Dear Leader according to Rasmussen- looks like a lot of people coming-out of the ether now…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Rove’s right and he backs everything up beautifully. Obama and the democrats are a sick joke on the American people.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yeah, Rove is right on now; but when Bush was in office and Rove was at his right hand, he’s the guy that personally told Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo to his face “Well, don’t ever darken the doorstep of the White House.” over the chaos on the U.S. border.
http://www.steinreport.com/oreilly_tancredo_11222002.htm
I appreciate Karl, but I take what he says with a grain of salt. He now has an allegiance to history and wants’ the Bush presidency that he WORKED FOR to be looked upon favorably in perpetuity. He’s only defending what is defensible, and doing it admirably.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0