Minnesota Windmills Stop Working Due to Cold

January 30, 2010
By 4 comments

This just drips with irony. We’re using windmills to combat global warming and it’s too cold for the windmills to work. But, if they use heat generated by electricity or natural gas at each turbine they can get them working again. That’s efficient.

At least Minnesota’s windmills didn’t just fall over. That’s worse.

vaso link

4 Responses to Minnesota Windmills Stop Working Due to Cold

  1. Fenway_Nation on January 30, 2010 at 6:01 pm

    I kinda love the irony and schadenfreude involved in that, but truth be told I don’t have anything against trying to harness energy from something that’s constantly there like the wind or sun.

    What I DO have a problem with is artificially inflating the price of energy provided by coal, natural gas or oil through punitive taxation or ‘carbon offset fees’ as proposed in Cap & trade. Simply put, that POS bill that passed in the house last summer will murder jobs in the oil refining, energy exploration, oil and natural gas drilling, coal mining, pipeline and railway industries (many railways’ lifeblood to this day is hauling coal to power plants). Let wind, Nuclear and solar compete with those energy forms through free enterprise, no government imposed restrictions on their would-be competitors.

    P.S. Upstate NY sits on top of two natural gas deposits- the Utica Shale and the Marcellus shale. Have the greens from NYC successfully driven out those eeeevil job-providing natural gas exploration companies that want to do hydraulic fracture drilling?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Lonely Conservative on January 30, 2010 at 6:31 pm

      They are doing their best – every day there’s another hydrofracking protest. We’ll just sit on top of the gas and leave it in the ground. The funny thing is, Paterson’s all for it. He wants to tax it!

      As for wind mills, I have no problem with the technology. And if free people want to build wind mills and sell the electricity they produce, fine with me. But when gov’t “invests” our money in unreliable energy sources, I have a problem with that. Wind isn’t reliable and certainly can’t be looked at as a way to replace fossil fuels or nuclear power.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Fenway_Nation on January 30, 2010 at 6:43 pm

        Heh….you’re probably not a fan of ethanol, then.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • Lonely Conservative on January 30, 2010 at 7:04 pm

          No, not much! I like to eat corn.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Shop Target!

Shop Daily Deals at Target.com. Always Free Shipping.

Content here is free, but tips are greatly appreciated

Sponsor

support this site – visit our advertisers

Ted Cruz for US Senate!

Visit the Finger Lakes

fingerlakes rentals

My Latest Tweets

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

Larwyn’s Linx

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Search this blog

Archives

Memeorandum

Start your Amazon search here

stat counter

Site Meter

Secure Your Website

Review this blog

Review http://lonelyconservative.com on alexa.com

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin