Senator Paul Kirk May Be Unable to Vote in Senate After Tuesday

January 17, 2010
By 4 comments

This could be huge.

The Weekly Standard: Appointed Senator Paul Kirk will lose his vote in the Senate after Tuesday’s election in Massachusetts of a new senator and cannot be the 60th vote for Democratic health care legislation, according to Republican attorneys.

Kirk has vowed to vote for the Democratic bill even if Republican Scott Brown is elected but not yet certified by state officials and officially seated in the Senate.  Kirk’s vote is crucial because without the 60 votes necessary to stop a Republican filibuster, the bill will be defeated.

This would be a devastating loss for President Obama and congressional Democrats.  The bill, dubbed ObamaCare, is the centerpiece of the president’s agenda.  Brown has campaigned on becoming the 41st vote against ObamaCare.

But in the days after the election, it is Kirk’s status that matters, not Brown’s.  Massachusetts law says that an appointed senator remains in office “until election and qualification of the person duly elected to fill the vacancy.”  The vacancy occurred when Senator Edward Kennedy died in August.  Kirk was picked as interim senator by Governor Deval Patrick.

Democrats in Massachusetts have talked about delaying Brown’s “certification,” should he defeat Democrat Martha Coakley on Tuesday.  Their aim would be to allow Kirk to remain in the Senate and vote the health care bill.

But based on Massachusetts law, Senate precedent, and the U.S. Constitution, Republican attorneys said Kirk will no longer be a senator after election day, period.  Brown meets the age, citizenship, and residency requirements in the Constitution to qualify for the Senate.  “Qualification” does not require state “certification,” the lawyers said.

Via memeorandum

vaso link

4 Responses to Senator Paul Kirk May Be Unable to Vote in Senate After Tuesday

  1. The Griper on January 17, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    that may be true about U.S. Constitutrional qualifications but that doesn’t say that states can’t add additional qualifications, does it?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. MK on January 17, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Yesterday i even read of a 10th amendment possibility of stopping obamacare.

    Either way i hope all these ways can work because we all know those slimy dems will try to slide this through in any way possible, the will of the people be damned.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. michigan on January 17, 2010 at 9:11 pm

    It doesn’t matter what Harry Reid has to do to bang the gavel and proclaim passage. The Democrats will stop at NOTHING to accomplish this. Legal, illegal, it doesn’t matter; we are dealing with suicidal terrorists of liberty.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Lonely Conservative on January 17, 2010 at 9:27 pm

      We’ll have to wait and see. I may be wrong, but my understanding is that if they want to ram it through with 51 votes they’re going to have to start all over again. But I could be wrong, so don’t quote me on that. I know they are nervous. Why else was Obummer there today?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Advertise Here!


blog advertising is good for you

Shop Target!

Shop Daily Deals at Target.com. Always Free Shipping.

Content here is free, but tips are greatly appreciated

Sponsor

support this site – visit our advertisers

Ted Cruz for US Senate!

Visit the Finger Lakes

fingerlakes rentals

My Latest Tweets

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

Larwyn’s Linx

Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx

Search this blog

Archives

Memeorandum

Start your Amazon search here

stat counter

Site Meter

Secure Your Website

Review this blog

Review http://lonelyconservative.com on alexa.com

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin