I’m Rethinking My Support of the Mount Vernon Statement

At first blush it sounded like a good way to unite conservatives.

After reading this, I’m having second thoughts.

At the time, I mentioned that, even if I agreed that the Mount Vernon Statement was necessary or useful, I could not in good conscience sign it because Grover Norquist had signed it and Mr. Norquist was and is a useful idiot for the Jihadists.

It seems I am not alone in thinking this way.  I did not notice until today that on 18 February Michelle Malkin published a blog entry wherein she asked some uncomfortable questions of those who had signed the Statement.

Read the whole thing and make up your own mind.

Share this post

Hide Sites

More from LonelyConservative

• Glenn Beck Answers Critics of his CPAC Speech
• The Vapor Bill Finally Materializes – All 2074 Pages of It
• Scary Headline of the Day

LonelyConservative Recommends

• Agent Of Islam: “I am a Muslim,” Obama Tells Egyptian Foreign Minister  (chicagoray)
• Coming Attraction: ” The Resurrection of Rod Blagojevich” – M. Malkin  (chicagoray)
• See A Face of Fear On the Border – Video  (chicagoray)
• I'm Out Of My Tree...  (SnarkyBasterd)

Related posts:

1. Just in Time for CPAC – The Mount Vernon Statement
2. Video: Michelle Malkin 1, Matt Lauer 0
3. George H W Bush celebrates his 85th birthday from a parachute
4. Support the Troops
5. Video: Rush Limbaugh’s Today Show Interview Day 1