I guess I won’t be quitting my day job any time soon.
John Hawkins on the death of the independent conservative blogosphere. Is there no room for the little guys (and gals)?
4) The market has also become much more professionalized. When I got started, back in 2001, a lone blogger who did 3-4 posts a day could build an audience. Unless your name is Ann Coulter, you probably couldn’t make that strategy work today.
Instead, most successful blogs today have large staffs, budgets, and usually, the capacity to shoot traffic back and forth with other gigantic websites. Look at Redstate, which is tied into Human Events, Hot Air which connected with Townhall, Instapundit, which is a part of Pajamas Media, Newsbusters which is a subsidiary of the Media Research Center and other monster entities like National Review and all of its blogs, Glenn Beck’s The Blaze, and the Breitbart media empire. An independent blogger competing with them is like a mom & pop store going toe-to-toe with Wal-Mart. Some do better than others, but over the long haul, the only question is whether you can survive on the slivers of audience they leave behind. This plays into #5.
5) Most bloggers are not very good at marketing, not very good at monetizing, there are no sugar daddies giving us cash, and this isn’t the biggest market in the world to begin with. In other words, this is a time-consuming enterprise, but few people are going to make enough money to go full time. How many people can put in 20-30-40-50 hours a week on something that’s not going to ever be their full time job? Can they do it for 5 years? 10 years? 15? 20? This is the plight that 99.9% of serious, independent conservative bloggers face. This has already created a lot of attrition and over the next few years, as people realize that their traffic is more likely to slowly, but surely significantly deteriorate rather than explode, you’re going to see a lot more people give up. …
Yikes! I’ve been at this a little over three years, and I’m not ready to give up yet. I never really expected to become one of the big dogs. I’m kind of in the same place as Donald Douglas.
I’ve been blogging for 5 and a half years. I’m averaging probably 2,500 visitors a day, the majority of those through search. I don’t have a large commentariat, for various reasons, not the least of which is that progressives trolls ruined the threads. But I keep plugging away because I enjoy it for me. I get my news and entertainment from blogging, and I have enough of a core readership to get feedback and encouragement to keep it up. Besides, I don’t trust the MSM most of the time, so I feel an obligation to keep going, for the public good, however marginal my contribution might be. …
I know what he means about the progressive trolls. Sigh.
Newbies might want to follow the links and read both posts in their entirety. Hopefully this won’t discourage you from blogging, but might help to keep expectations in check.
Update: Linked by Steve at No Runny Eggs (thanks!) who found a number of others commenting on this. Professor Jacobson noted he’s addressed this issue before, and Jimmie Bise had quite a bit to say that’s worth reading. John Lilyea also offers a little bit of advice.
Update 2: Dan Riehl is much more optimistic, and also offers some good advice to would-be bloggers. (Go for it!)
Update 3: Donald Douglas has a follow up post, and mentioned that this blog is ranked #57 on Technorati. That can change, it goes up and down. I’m not at all sure how it works, but I appreciate the mention at American Power.

if you think you got problems, try following some physics blogs ! One site has a bunch of undefined trolls – too stupid to be libs and more obnoxious in their own way, and they are not even political.
Like or Dislike:
1
[...] shouldn’t have to worry about his place in the pecking order), Ann Althouse, John Lilyea, the Lonely Conservative, Dan Riehl, and Gregory Flap Cole, and then follow along the winding, rambling [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
The problem with ‘trolls’ is that a lot of the newer blogs give them power by responding to them, which is the attention they deserve. And no, it’s not just ‘progressives’ that do it.
A troll commonly, and quite typically, champions anything contrary to the site he’s looking for attention from. More often than not, the person doesn’t hold any of the beliefs that he claims to post, and it’s painfully obvious at times.
If everyone ignored them, and just posted constructive feed back or discussion, they’ll eventually move on. Sure, some more might pop up here and there; but a troll by habit, is a creature of low attention span, especially if he’s not getting what he wants.
The few ‘trolls’ that remain, are regulars, are probably not trolls. Remember, trolls are people that want to be contrary to the subject at hand, for attention. These regulars, probably do really think what they say is true, and that can be a good, but scary thing, depending on the subject matter at hand. They might not be looking for negative attention – they may be well meaning, even if misinformed, or coming off as hurtful.
The one thing you don’t ever want to do however, is make a blanket statement about a group of people based off their beliefs. It only strengthens their resolve to ‘troll’, while hurting those who were well meaning in the first place.
Like or Dislike:
1
We had quite a few of them haunting this place for a while. I did a post about them and they went away. They were discouraging other readers from leaving comments. I always try to avoid “feeding the trolls” but sometimes they get me at a weak moment.
Like or Dislike:
0
[...] As the lovely Lonely Conservative said, “I guess I won’t be quitting my day job anytime soon.” [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
[...] The Lonely Conservative [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
[...] Read more commentary from The Lonely Conservative: The Death of Independent Conservative Blogs? R… [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
I’m a comparative johnny-come-lately to the fray. I didn’t start my blog until the early part of 2009. I expected the blog to generate a few contributors, but it never did. 99% of the excellent text on there is mine.
I believe it was easier to develop contributors years ago when all of this was new. Nowadays, most anyone who can write…is already writing.
I guess in the end, it serves two functions for me. I write pretty much what the typical Tea Party person is thinking, which gives the reader justification and hope that he is not alone, and of course, it gives me a place to have my say.
I guess this will have to do. To date, no secret conservative funder with deep pockets has contacted me to give me money to do what I like to do anyway.
One neat thing that has kept views lower. I have top billing on Yahoo and Bing, but Google long ago banished me to the cellar. I must be doing something right.
Norm – Most Conservative Website – AlabamaTeaParty.org
Like or Dislike:
1
Well, I would love to get 2500 hits a day. We blog because we have something to say. We know it isn’t a full-time income and not even a worthwhile part-time income, but we are speaking about things that we care about, so we keep going.
AmericaisConservative.blogspot.com
Like or Dislike:
3
I agree with Lisa, I blog because I believe it matters and I have something to say about the way our countries leaders are directing us. Whether I get 5 hits or 200 hits a day, it all matters. Please visit my litle site http://themanminute.com You can make your own mind!
Like or Dislike:
0
I think as long as there’s Rule 5, there will always be independent conservative blogs.
You know what’s been driving the majority of traffic to my blog this summer? Lisa Kelly from Ice Road Truckers
Like or Dislike:
0