Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels delivered the Republican response to the State of the Union. It was fantastic. Speaker Boehner released some highlights earlier.
“As Republicans our first concern is for those waiting tonight to begin or resume the climb up life’s ladder. We do not accept that ours will ever be a nation of haves and have nots; we must always be a nation of haves and soon to haves.”…
“The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly safe pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy. It must be replaced by a passionate pro-growth approach that breaks all ties and calls all close ones in favor of private sector jobs that restore opportunity for all and generate the public revenues to pay our bills.
“That means a dramatically simpler tax system of fewer loopholes and lower rates. A pause in the mindless piling on of expensive new regulations that devour dollars that otherwise could be used to hire somebody. It means maximizing on the new domestic energy technologies that are the best break our economy has gotten in years.”…
“It’s not fair and it’s not true for the President to attack Republicans in Congress as obstacles on these questions. They and they alone have passed bills to reduce borrowing, reform entitlements, and encourage new job creation, only to be shot down nearly time and again by the President and his Democrat Senate allies.”…
“No feature of the Obama Presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others. As in previous moments of national danger, we Americans are all in the same boat. If we drift, quarreling and paralyzed, over a Niagara of debt, we will all suffer, regardless of income, race, gender, or other category. If we fail to shift to a pro-jobs, pro-growth economic policy, there will never be enough public revenue to pay for our safety net, national security, or whatever size government we decide to have.” …
“2012 must be the year we prove the doubters wrong. The year we strike out boldly not merely to avert national bankruptcy but to say to a new generation that America is still the world’s premier land of opportunity. Republicans will speak for those who believe in the dignity and capacity of the individual citizen; who believe that government is meant to serve the people rather than supervise them; who trust Americans enough to tell them the plain truth about the fix we are in, and to lay before them a specific, credible program of change big enough to meet the emergency we are facing.”
You can read the full text at Business Insider.

I’m a Hoosier and a conservative. I’ve been amazed at how Daniels has been painted as some sort of squishy republican by the blogosphere on the right. He’s been nothing short of spectacular as our Governor, and I loved his response to President Classwarfare.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
Great reply!
He attacks the Obama new age socialism straight ahead. Too bad he’s not in the GOP presidential race!
Romney and Gingrich are so busy gashing each other, Santorum and Paul cannot respond, and Obama is gaining momentum in the polls once again!
It’s time for debate not taunting among the GOP front runners!
Go McDaniels!!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0
Obama single handedly is destroying the economy! He said that Bush’s $5 Trillion in debt run up was unpatriotic!
But, he has run up more debt than any other president, but claims to be saving our economy!
Obama is blatantly ignoring the requirement to pass a budget; he does not want to observe any constitutional requirements to manage the affairs of government. He makes imperial demands to congress that if they won’t endorse his Marxist policies, he will continue to bypass congress and do his own thing!
Further, he has abdicated his role as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, by foolishly destroying the main job given by the constitution: to ensure the national defense.
Obama’s inglorious mention of the military’s contributions to this country was clouded by his complete and utter contempt for the military that he has demonstrated by vindictively trashing the defense budget as retaliation to the congressional failures to reduce the budget!
He is the supreme village idiot!
He believes in funneling huge government project to his vile supporters, (George Soros, Warren Buffett). He illegally abuses his powers to punish those who do not support his agenda.
Obama insists in destroying jobs in America, but seeks trade partners that will take his bribes and deprive Americans of the benefits of economic investments and jobs created by fulfilling the constitution to create an economic program that builds our country.
At best, Obama’s policies can be described as unethical while others imply he is an economic terrorist. Either of these conclusions, if proven, would be grounds for impeachment.
The sooner the impeachment proceedings begin, the better the economy will respond to the rightful prosecution of fraud at the executive branch of federal government!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
Once again Joesph, your argument rings hollow. Much like Daniels, the context of your reply falls short on facts, completely evades my points, and leans strictly towards an emotional dislike of Obama.
My post, which you replied to, dissected Daniels SOTU response and exposed numerous false statements that couldn’t stand up to scrutiny.
Your response goes off in a different direction of ODS attacks beginning with “Obama single handedly is destroying the economy!” (which is completely false) and simply bash your way through to end by calling for an impeachment (which is baseless). In other words, like Daniels, you have nothing of substance so you fill that void with an ad hominem spin, perhaps hoping that replacing dialog with diatribe will magically give your rant credence.
Like or Dislike:
0
Obama is fine, he’s merely a puppet. Life in the 57th state must have clouded his judgment.
He reads from a teleprompter, because he cannot relate to those of us who grew up in the original 50.
I have never met Obama, and have no inclination as to whether I would like him as a person.
He is inspiring, obviously, because he has won elections as US Senator and US President, and he has many devout followers, such as you!
Politicians push agendas, which is their job. I choose to exercise my right to draw attention to those presidential agenda items that I believe to be counterproductive!
As far as the union rights to protest against non-union workers benefiting from hard fought member benefits, you have the right to say so! However, I have observed much inefficiency among labor unions and their members! So, we won’t find much room for agreement here!
Like or Dislike:
1
Daniels address was just fine….except for two instances. The idea of means testing the medical care and social security programs is a disaster. I really don’t care to pay 3.9% of all of my income on medicare, and then be told that I have to pay my own medical costs, which will be enormously inflated because of government spending. Already skilled nursing costs about 100-120K per year if you are spending your own money. Medicare pays about 50-60k per patient. So there is already a “tax” imposed on private payers by the difference in what the providers charge them.
There are not enough really rich people that cutting them out of the benefit side of the equation would make any real difference to the costs. (and not to mention that it shifts these programs more towards the pure welfare status). If you deny benefits to people who make more than say, 50K, then that would have an impact, but I don’t think there is any support for that idea.
There needs to be more thinking about this idea. Mitch’s take on it is bad. Means testing of mandatory social and medical insurance programs doesn’t work…..and won’t ever. There’s not enough savings unless you set the level at the middle class.
By the way, why does no one focus on the editorial that Buffett wrote about his secretary’s tax rate where, in the later paragraph’s he notes that we have made promises that not even a rich country can afford? There is no reason for anyone to accept a tax increase if the government is going to continue to spend $1.40 for every additional dollar of receipts. We already owe 50,000 at the federal level for every breathing person in the US.
Like or Dislike:
1