This is a long story, but it’s important. Unfortunately, it all started with George H. W. Bush, as Maggie noted. But Obama’s making the giveaway of Alaskan islands to Russia a done deal, so the blame lies with him, if you ask me. Via New Zeal, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton summed it up for us.
Imagine you wake up tomorrow and this is not a Constitutional Republic anymore. It is now a dictatorship. Whoops! Already accomplished. Then imagine that you wake up tomorrow and the President and our elites have given away part of the US. Then imagine it was your state and your state and Senators weren’t even consulted on it. In fact the deal was conducted in secret. Well, the nightmare is alive and well and being finalized for Alaska. But, before you go cursing ONLY Obama (as I do every damn chance I get), you better have a really hard look at Progressives on both sides of the aisle. This monstrous act of treason started under Bush Senior in 1990 and was ratified by our Senate in 1991. The only thing holding it back was that Russia had not signed the treaty. Obama is now looking to finish the diabolical deal.
There’s much more at the link, be sure to read it all. We now have a president who not only refuses to look out for the interests of the United States of America, he actually goes out of his way to work against our interests. No wonder he finds it necessary to trot out his kids.
Update: Maggie spoke with Joe Miller about this issue, and has a long post clarifying the matter. (But things are still kind of murky.) Here’s the conclusion:
What we learn from this story is that a Secretary of State can engineer giving away sovereign land with no input from the U.S. Congress or the state holding ownership. The other side is, if the co-ordinates of the 1867 Treaty referring to the “western” and “eastern” boundaries clearly put all of the disputed islands on the Russian side, that’s a problem for the U.S. But then…apparently the style of map used can make a difference and the maps are no where to be found, and the style of map is not named. AND there are the explorers who claimed these islands for the U.S. AND Russia has not ratified. AND how about the unconfirmed ‘rumors’ that the Obama administration is working to get Russia’s signature on the 1990 Agreement? One last question: if the 1867 Treaty set out the boundaries, why did we need the 1990 Agreement?
Be sure to read the whole thing.

Communist always prefer doing business with other communist!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
20
Not to worry,this is all in Gods plan and the end is near. Obama is just a tool that God is using to fulfill his plan. Obama is not a type of Christ but a type of Anti-Christ but one day soon the true Anti-Christ will arrive and it will not be a flesh man. As I study Gods word I can assure you that it reads as tomorrows newspaper. It is exciting to see it come to pass as it is written. I know that this give away of the Alaskan islands was meant to be. For anyone who is fearing the end don’t. God is in control as he has been since the beginning. The evil will be done away with and we who love God will live in peace with him forever.
Hot debate. What do you think?
8
I doubt Obama will either finalize or dissolve this traitorous giveaway in an election year. We can only hope that a new, patriotic, non-progressive American President will quash this.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
The great majority of idiots in this country will not even know about it. It won’t be a factor in this year’s election no matter what he does. How many people know, or care about Fast and Furious?. Solyndra? Etc etc etc. By the way, Bush I was a piece of crap anyway.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
LightSquared is the next illegal act to be taken up by the House! If we impeach the bum, the election would be settled.
However, Obama’s attempt to choke the consumer into submission on gas prices to boost Volt sales may be his undoing!
Even slaves rebel if shoved under water. This is political water boarding!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13
Dream on, Joseph. I admire your optimism. Wish I could share it Good luck.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
If we pay Russia to rake it, Obama can even one-up Carter’s deal on the Panama Canal. We are living through a national nightmare. Why aren’t the GOP candidates yelling about this?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
16
If the GOP candidates chose to talk about issues like this they would be taken more seriously! They need to stop acting like third grade school yard brawlers and act like leaders!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14
Leaders? I disagree. They need to act more like representatives and begin representing the people of this republic.
a (1) : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government b (1) : a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
The Law being the constitution and not a load of special interest precedents formulated to bypass said law.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
GOP candidates?
WAKE UP!
They are all a part of what is going on!
The Republicians are the right wing of a Progressive/Socialist bird winging its way towards a Marxist/Communist world, the Democrats the left wing.
They are all traitors to the American Constitutional Republic and should be treated as such.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
Bush I, McCain, Dole, your point is taken, Bob. It is hard to believe that McCain didn’t deliberately tank the 2008 election. He could not have been that bad by mistake.
Like or Dislike:
4
…”It is hard to believe that McCain”…
What I find harder to believe is the rnc shoved mccain off on us after repeated warnings from party members that they would not vote for mccain a year before he was nominated. Then they paired him with the ever “you betcha” quitter from Alaska and tried to make it look legit.
People are going to have to stop believing that some candidate is going to come riding up in some bright and shining armor and save the day.
If you want change you have to vote for change, and the only candidate that has consistently voted against the status quo is the one everybody claims is unelectable. Why? Because he isn’t like the rest of the sorry bunch.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
This story is not true..
Russia owned lands. In 1867 in what was called the “Alaska Purchase”, Russia in a treaty sold part of their lands to the United States for the price of $ 7, 200,000. None of these islands were included in that treaty.
So, how can Obama or anyone give away islands that were never part of the Untited States?
Read the treaty. Plot the Western boundary coordinates on a map or Google. It is obvious which side of that line those islands are.
Links for Treaty of 1867
orginal US Senate Document http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg21&CISOPTR=2210&REC=2
html versioin
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/treatywi.asp
pdf version (typed)
Links for Treaty of 1867
orginal US Senate Document http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg21&CISOPTR=2210&REC=2
html versioin
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/treatywi.asp
pdf version
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/polsciwb/brianl/docs/1867Alaskapurchasetreaty.pdf
Map Plot Points.
Points of Reference
Mys (Cape) Chukotski, 64° 14′.2 N 173° 05′.5 W
southeast extremity
St. Lawrence Island, 63° 47′.3 N 171° 45′.8 W
northwest extremity
Medny (Copper Island) 54° 32′.2 N 168° 00′ E
eastern extremity
Border Line
Starting point Treaty Line 65° 30′.0 N 168° 58′ 22″.587 W
North of point: (“proceeds north without limitation” on 168° 58′ 22″.587 W)
South of point:
65° 30′.0 N 168° 58′ 22″.587 W
to:
Turning Point 64° 12′.3 N 172° 00′ W
to:
Mid Point between Medny 53° 45′.0 N 170° 16′.0 E
and Attu Island
to:
End Point, southwestern 50° 36′.4 N 167° 00′ E
Everything west of that line stays with Russia. Everything east of the line is sold to the United States.
Like or Dislike:
2
Somehow, I posted the links two times..
But, here is a correction.
The link to the Original US Senate Document of the US-Russia Treat of 1867 is:
http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg22&CISOPTR=85
Like or Dislike:
2
Just a follow-up with a very good additional link for additional information on the 1867 Treaty: http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Alaska.html#American
The Senate ratified the treaty on April 9, 1867 on a vote of 37-2.
The House approved the appropriation on July 14, 1868 with a vote of 113-48.
Like or Dislike:
2
[...] Linked at The Lonely Conservative – thanks! [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
[...] Linked by The Lonely Conservative – thanks Karen! [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
I missed the last sentence of the article..
One last question: if the 1867 Treaty set out the boundaries, why did we need the 1990 Agreement?
We did not need the 1990 “Agreement”… precisely because of the 1867 Treaty. Remember… Russia never signed the 1990 “Agreement” Why? Because we already have the 1867 TREATY.
Now, of course, the US owns none of the islands mentioned, precisely because of the 1867 TREATY…
but, addressing the premise regarding Obama giving away lands to another country… He cannot do so without Senate approval.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4