Earlier today BuzzFeed posted an edited video of Barack Obama in the 1990′s at a rally for tenure for black female professors at Harvard Law. However, it appears there is more to the story, and according to Big Government the unedited video will be released tonight on Sean Hannity’s show.
The video, which Kaczynski says was “licensed from a Boston television station,” shows a young Barack Obama leading a protest at Harvard Law School on behalf of Prof. Derrick Bell, a radical academic tied to Jeremiah Wright–about whom we will be releasing significant information in the coming hours.
However, the video has been selectively edited–either by the Boston television station or by Buzzfeed itself. Over the course of the day, Breitbart.com will be releasing additional footage that has been hidden by Obama’s allies in the mainstream media and academia.
Breitbart.com Editor-in-Chief Joel Pollak and Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro will appear on The Sean Hannity Show to discuss the tape. The full tape will be released tonight on Fox News’ Hannity. (Read More)
That should be interesting.
In related news, the tape of Obama at the Alinsky Love Song play exists, but the Obama ally who has it in her possession refuses to release it.
Update:The video has been released, you can watch it here. There’s more on Derrick Bell here, here and here. If there’s nothing to it, why was it hidden? Why didn’t they want people to see a young Obama hugging Derrick Bell?

I will be tuned in to Hannity!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
2
Shut the hell up you miserable skankhole! Momma’s yelling for you to come to supper. Little rat bastard!
Like or Dislike:
3
WOW, you got worked up on that quick like. Must be hitting a nerve. PROVE odumb-dumb ISN’T a commie! You miserable bag of meat with balls in your mouth, (to paraphrase your intellectual equals in the socialist media)!
Like or Dislike:
1
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
2
They hid the tape for a reason dildo breath. They didn’t want anyone to see Obama hugging a radical. Wake up douche bag!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
Hey wad-waste, quit giving yourself a green check, it’s too obvious!
So you’re saying there are no more suprises coming? All these things are non-issues? GOOD! If you’re so smart, why not tell us what Breitbart has in store for us BEFORE it comes out. If the LIAR IN CHIEF in the WH is sooooooo open and transparent, then all his past doings are there for all to see. Just post the links and beat Breitbart at his own game!
C’mon show us how open and transparent you are. WE ARE WAITING!!!
Like or Dislike:
3
1991 Obama video aired in 2008
By JOSEPH WILLIAMS |
3/7/12 4:23 PM EST
POLITICO
The “racially themed” video of President Barack Obama as a 29-year-old Harvard law student that’s gone viral on the Web was broadcast as part of a PBS documentary on the future president nearly four years ago.
On the eve of the groundbreaking 2008 presidential election, the Boston-based documentary program “Frontline” broadcast a program on Obama titled, “The Choice,” which featured a version of the same video: Obama introducing Derrick Bell, Harvard’s first African American tenured law professor, at a rally in solidarity with Bell and support of affirmative action in the law school’s admissions process. The video was part of an extended broadcast tracing Obama’s path from childhood in Hawaii and Indonesia to his election as the nation’s first black president.
Hot debate. What do you think?
3
EXACTLY, on the eve of the election when most people had already made up their mind, or there was not time enough for it to be diseminated and understood.
The average American had/has no idea who Bell was/is, so unless there was time to clarify what the video was, it could be that odumb-dumb was introducing the owner of the newest TACO BELL franchise. Who would have a chance to know?
But it is disingenuous to claim that just because it was brodcast the night before the vote, all Americans saw it and understood it’s relevence to the election. This is odumb-dumbs definition of transperancy??
Socialist BS at it’s best!
Like or Dislike:
2
In”they” hid the video “they” did a really poor job, since it seems PBS aired the video in a Frontline episode in October 2008 – just weeks before the election.
Hot debate. What do you think?
3
Scenes of embracement were not shown and sound tracks were heavily edited and some omitted.
You’re no “fact checker”, you’re a hack.
Like or Dislike:
5
Nothing was edited, fool. Watch the Frontline episode. The Breitbart video was the one that was edited. As usual.
Hot debate. What do you think?
2
You’re ignorant, unprepared and wrong, again. Oh, and your YouTube vid, bwahahaha! Fail, like you.
Like or Dislike:
3
Too bad he’s not willing to embrace some American ideals.
Oops, how Romney of me. To point out that we are, in fact, Americans.
Obama never hid nor apologized for being Marxist at heart, for seeking out those people and soaking up their ideology. He’s just the enemy….don’t know how else to describe a man whose goal is to fundamentally change America into something else. I hope the Left is still tickled pink when a Conservative is in office, using all of this unconstitutional power to force them into things. Will be interesting to observe.
Like or Dislike:
3
It is important to know who Bell is, and how radical he is, for these tapes to have their full impact. If you don’t see it as a big deal for Obama to willingly associate with this radical, then you need to do some more research on Bell to educate yourself.
As far as PBS having already aired them: this is a tactic of the Great Deceiver. PBS edited the video heavily before airing it. Why did they edit them? By the way, Breitbart’s crew themselves pointed this out before they were aired.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
Pwned:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=y9NjHznpZJU
Hot debate. What do you think?
2
Let’s trade links on this topic!
Soledad seemed the fool, not knowing what she was talking about, once again!
See: “Video: Does O’Brien know what “Critical Race Theory” is?”
“After sneering at Joel Pollak for supposedly mischaracterizing the discipline and then refusing to define it herself, she finally demonstrates her grasp of Critical Race Theory by uncorking a definition that’s curiously similar to … the opening of Wikipedia’s intro on CRT, replete with the noncolloquial use of “intersection” to describe an interdisciplinary study. Could be a coincidence — the definition she gives is generic — but the thought of her taking this much of a tone with him over his alleged ignorance while she’s got some intern reading Wiki entries to her in her earpiece is irresistible.”
If Soledad insists on attacking someone else on the grounds of truthfulness, be ready with a big-girl lawyer-ish sounding definition!
She needed a Wikipedia bailout! That might qualify her for 6th grade TV!
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/08/video-the-wikipedia-definition-of-critical-race-theory/
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
The headline for that video should be “Breitbart editor meets hostile interviewer.”
Like or Dislike:
3
It’s election season people, why else would this be getting released NOW of all times, it’s just another load of crap used by Obama opponents. This means nothing, sheesh let’s get back to the actual issues for once in this country!!
Like or Dislike:
0
Bwhahahahaha! Nice try, Val! “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”. Stay tuned for much more of this “crap” to come!
Like or Dislike:
2