Why, you didn’t believe liberal radio host Ed Schultz really gives a darn about union workers did you? Ha! He gets paid for his advocacy of unions – and quite handsomely, at that. NewsBusters has the scoop:
In fiscal 2011, Schultz received $190,000 from the Communications Workers of America for what the U.S. Department of Labor categorized as “representational activities.”
For swag like that, you’d think Schultz could at least get it right about the CWA name. Instead, he invariably refers to it as the “Communication” Workers of America when its president, Larry Cohen, is a guest on Schultz’s radio show, as Cohen often is.
Schultz also received $9,900 in fiscal 2011 from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), putting his union haul for the year at almost $200,000. (Read More)
Oh my! Who would have thought this lefty windbag shill would have enough listeners to warrant such a large payout?
Thank goodness for new media, if we had to rely on the MSM for our news none of this would ever come out.
***
Speaking of Ed Schultz, did Gloria Allred ever demand that he be arrested after he called Laura Ingraham a “right wing slut?” No, I didn’t think so. Come to think of it, the unions didn’t seem to care, considering how they continue to line his pockets.
Cross posted at Right Wing News

I wonder if Schultzie’s ready to re-distribute all that scratch since he’s the dude professing Socialism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXX4GA6yJIA
Just another phony mouthpiece of the high paid left. A 1%er by the way to all you OWSers out there.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
That is freakin amazing – where do I sign up ? I could use the money.
How many dues were paid to go to Ed – mister ed, the talking horse. Isn’t that a “conflict of interest” that the leftoids are always going on about ? Or the APPEARANCE of conflict of interest ? I wonder if MSNBC or MS-LSD knows about this little arrangement. I wonder if Sharpton also has a similar arrangement. And Maybe Soledad too.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0