A vote is scheduled in the House today on a bill that will fund transportation programs through September. House Republicans again included language mandating federal approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. Of course, President Obama said he will veto the bill if it includes the Keystone provision.
It would take permitting of the proposed Alberta-to-Texas pipeline away from the State Department and task the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission with approving the project.
“Because this bill circumvents a longstanding and proven process for determining whether cross-border pipelines are in the national interest by mandating the permitting of the Keystone XL pipeline before a new route has been submitted and assessed, the president’s senior advisers would recommend that he veto this legislation,” the White House said in a formal “statement of administration policy” Tuesday afternoon.
The threat continues the political thrust-and-parry between the White House and Republicans over the controversial project that is increasingly at the center of election-year energy battles.
The White House in January rejected TransCanada Corp.’s permit for the pipeline, but stressed the decision was not on the “merits.”
Instead, the White House said that a permitting deadline the GOP demanded in late 2011 payroll tax legislation would short-circuit proper review of Keystone, including the route around ecologically sensitive regions of Nebraska.
The White House has invited TransCanada to reapply but does not plan to make a decision until 2013. (Read More)
The Canadians have pretty much made it clear that 2013 could be too late. Not that President Obama cares, do you remember when he quietly lobbied the Senate to kill the last Keystone provision? Oh, but of course he made a big show of approving the part of the project that didn’t need approval. He prefers to continue dumping billions of taxpayer dollars into failed green energy projects.
If he does veto the bill, something tells me he won’t hold a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden to make the announcement, like he did with his plan for oil speculators.
Update: Bill Quick linked – it looks like he’s warming up to Romney.
Also, according to Fox News, the bill passed in the House, but it’s not the same bill that passed the Senate. What I don’t know is if the House bill contains the provision that would allow the IRS to confiscate passports of people they accuse of being delinquent on their taxes. If anyone knows, please leave a comment below.

Darn Republicans trying to rush the prez. He’s only had 3 1/2 years to study it. these things take time. It’s not like just giving billions to his friends in the green energy “business”. That’s easy. And this pipeline is not bound to fail, doesn’t cost the taxpayers anything, will provide jobs, and reduce the cost of fuel. There is no good reason to approve such a thing. Don’t you people understand anything?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
Of course Obama will veto the Keystone XL pipeline because it would create jobs and maybe even reduce the price of oil products. The “Green POTUS” is not interested in any of the above.
Rather than put the BLAME on some hypothetical; or some remote, “ecologically sensitive area” in Nebraska, WHY don’t the people in Nebraska submit their two cents worth rather than have all the decisions made by Washington fat cats. I’d be willing to wager the farmers and ranchers in Nebraska would give their left something or other for cheaper fuel to run their tractors, combines, trucks and maybe even a chance of heating their homes and barns this coming winter.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
Veto away, Dear Leader! With Americans feeling the pain as gas prices hover at four bucks a gallon and the summer driving season just coming up this will be an excellent point to continuously remind American voters of.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
I was just looking at Jim Hightower’s opinion on Keystone. His complaint was that they want a pipeline down to texas because crude will be refined down there in Port Arthur, and shipped to Europe, China and Latin America, and has little to do with reducing our reliance on OPEC, or reducing prices here. Otherwise why not refine
it in the midwest.
Like or Dislike:
1
I thought Hightower had died. Maybe it was just wishful thinking.
Like or Dislike:
2
No surprises here!
See attached link:
CORRUPTION: Obama Buddy Buffett Profits Handsomely From Keystone XL Pipeline Cancellation
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/corruption-obama-buddy-buffett-profits-handsomely-from-keystone-xl-pipeline-cancellation/question-2420943/
Like or Dislike:
2
Will you veto the Columbia reimbursement “other expenses” claims that your Secret Service submits, too, Comrade-In-Chief?
You’ve been in Office for over three years, now, Loser–why not just be a man and admit that you don’t have the slightest clue of what you’re doing–after all, the better part of this country knows. Yes, really.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
Obama’s environmentalist supporters have made the cancellation of Keystone XL into a quid pro quo litmus test: Their support for Obama is contingent on his canceling it.
The Sierra Club is going to endorse Obama only if he continues to oppose Keystone XL.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75274.html
Like or Dislike:
3
[...] Sandwich Versus Crap Tyrant Posted on April 18, 2012 3:30 pm by Bill Quick Obama Threatens to Veto Transportation Bill if it Contains Keystone Provision | The Lonely Conservat… A vote is scheduled in the House today on a bill that will fund transportation programs through [...]
Like or Dislike:
1