The latest White House excuse for President Obama’s attack on the Supreme Court in anticipation of his signature legislation getting struck down:
Carney: What I acknowledged yesterday is that speaking on Monday the president was not clearly understood by some people because he is a law professor, he spoke in shorthand.
He could have saved a few breaths by simply saying “You don’t understand Obama ‘cuz you’re dumb.”
You bible-thumping gun clingers – what do you know about the Constitution, anyway?


Mabye you don’t understand it Carney, but them’s fightin’ words.
And by the way, prove he ever was a law professor.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
I ain’t got no hi falutin ivey leege degree, but i no ima fixin to be way more smartest than carnival barker or his boss.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
A lie is a lie, no matter which day it was told.
It was other lawyers and a federal judge that responded to Monday’s lie, even if it was told in shorthand.
And no Jay, we dint believe you either!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
Carney is a paid liar, he is the best at the art of obfuscation they could find. If it comes out of his mouth it is suspect.
His is a pitiable job, requiring willful misrepresentation of truth, and the misleading of the innocent.
But more pitiable than he is the system of government that requires a person of his character to represent them as spokesperson. Our government has been sugar coating turds and calling them nuggets in order to sway public opinion all the while fleecing us like a flock of sheep. It matters not which side of the coin is in office, the same sugar coated feces is force fed the public in order to further the government.
Who can blame the media for lying like dogs when they have such a fine example of leadership as exhibited by the highest office of the land?
As Joseph said, it matters not what cushioning synonym one uses for this behavior, lies are lies, and habitually we are lied to.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
Both a former law professor and former law student of Obama took him the legal woodshed for his bone headed remarks of Monday. Just because Obama was speaking in shorthand, we was still a fool. Lockner v. New York had nothing to do with the federal commerce clause.
Like or Dislike:
3
More O-shorthand:
Uh, um, er, ah, well, let me be clear, um, uh, uh,…
‘cuz I said so, THAT’s why!!
So there!
Hmmph!
Like or Dislike:
2
Note to 2008 voters:
Remember the thrill of the Presidential Election of 2008…how excited YOU all were about the prospect that a smooth talking
black man could possibly be the best thing that happened to America?
Remember how smooth he talked and all the smiles? Remember all the
great promises he made?
DO YOU REMEMBER THAT HE PROMISED TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA?
EVERYONE had best remember what you wished for [you may just get
it...and boy,did we ever!!],and you had better vote based on the
actual facts this time around!
This is a pivotal moment in history,we either save what our
forefathers fought and died for .. or we may very well lose it all.
WAKE UP .. STAND UP .. UNITE!!
Like or Dislike:
2