For decades liberal politicians have been spending billions trillions of dollars fighting the “War on Poverty,” yet the poverty rate remains unchanged. But of course, they tell us that they just haven’t spent enough money.
The government is not making much headway reducing poverty despite spending hundreds of billions of dollars, according to a study by the libertarian Cato Institute.
Despite an unprecedented increase in federal anti-poverty spending the national poverty rate has not declined, it finds.
“[S]ince President Obama took office, federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year.” the study says.
Federal welfare spending this year now totals $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains stubbornly high at nearly 15 percent – roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.
Read the whole thing, but resist the urge to bang your head against anything hard.


It really is trillions of dollars spent on the war on poverty. When you pay folks to sit at home, fathers to stay away from families or women having several children out of wedlock, you can’t solve the problem.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
Much like the war on terror, a self perpetuating rat hole at which to throw money with no discernible progress, and no end in sight.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
Rush had it tabulated, from Johnson’s “Great Society” to the beginning of Bush ’43, at over 5 Trillion.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
Now, since El Beejay declared his “War on Poverty”, we’ve spent $10 trillion, and poverty won. We’ll have to spend more money, like “education”.
Like or Dislike:
3
How could it be otherwise! It’s just another government bloat system.
Only 20% to 25% of tax revenue collected actually makes it to the recipients.
I’m sure that as in other government programs, it was created just to buy votes for Marxist/socialist types. The only beneficiaries are government bureaucrats.
Like or Dislike:
3
For anyone who wants to read some research on the issue…read THE COSTS OF PUBLIC INCOME REDISTRIBUTION AND PRIVATE CHARITY by JAMES ROLPH EDWARDS from the Journal of Libertarian Studies.
Like or Dislike:
1
The only way to win the war on poverty is to work for a living.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
I disagree. The War on Poverty has been a great success. It creates and supports permanent democrat voters. Heavens forbid, if you taught a person how to get out of poverty, rather than living comfortably in it, they might turn conservative.
Like or Dislike:
2
It’s the wrong focus! The problem is not the large number of poor people (they’ll always be with us), the problem is that there are not enough rich people.
How about a programme that rewards captains of industry for mentoring likely candidates into creating their own enterprises?
Like or Dislike:
1
As long as the left is in power, poverty will always exist because just like all the rest of the progressive causes, the issue for their movement is worth vitally more to them than the fix for the rest of us and America.
Like or Dislike:
2