Now that Chief Justice John Roberts has upheld Obamacare’s individual mandate as constitutional because it’s a tax, it’s a good time for a reminder of all of the taxes included in the law. Americans for Tax Reform has a handy list of the taxes already in effect and those that will be phased in between now and 2018. The taxes come to more than $500 billion. But it will probably be much more than that when the full costs of this law are known, as Maggie pointed out.
In one year, the cost of ObamaCare has skyrocketed by $111 BILLION dollars - just one year, and they are still planning and adding and mandating.
None of this even takes into account what this will do to the economy.
Rush Limbaugh called this the largest tax hike in the history of the world.
So Obamacare is nothing more than the largest tax increase in the history of the world. And the people who were characterizing it as such were right and were telling the truth. We have the biggest tax increase in the history of the world right in the middle of one of this country’s worst recessions. In fact, as the vice president said yesterday, a depression for millions of Americans. The chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, said, “It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.” Not our job.
The editors of The Wall Street Journal concur, and remind us that this fight is now in the hands of voters:
It is now undeniable that Mr. Obama has imposed the largest tax increase in history on the middle class. Individuals who don’t buy insurance will have to pay several hundred dollars, depending on income. The Congressional Budget Office says that 76% of those who pay the mandate tax will make less than 500% of the federal poverty level, estimated to be $24,000 for a family of four in 2016. That means 76% of the payers will earn less than $120,000 a year.
So much for Mr. Obama’s promise not to raise taxes on anyone earning less than $200,000. And this initial mandate tax will only be a teaser rate when it becomes clear it isn’t nearly enough either to finance the bill or drive individuals to buy insurance. Millions will wait to buy insurance until they need expensive treatment, knowing they can always buy it when they show up at the hospital.
Meanwhile, the law’s new rules are already spreading through the health system—12,000 Federal Register pages and counting—and private insurance premiums are starting to climb as a result. Rates rose 9% last year, or by $1,200 for the average American family, and ObamaCare will send them higher. ObamaCare also forms over 150 new boards with power over the health markets, in particular an unaccountable bureaucracy run by 15 solons who will eventually decide on the treatments that patients are allowed to receive.
Also, see The Roberts Rules for more commentary on the SCOTUS ruling. Some conservatives on our side, like George Will, see the silver lining in all of this. I get where they’re coming from but I just disagree. So do the four dissenting Justices. Then again, Charles Hurt made some good points.
Though he shocked many by joining the left plank on the high court, Justice Roberts. pretty much did what he was supposed to do. He finally put a boundary on how much freedom the federal government can gobble up from states and individuals under the “commerce clause” — that most specious scheme for so much federal thievery.
Then he told President Obama and his kleptocrats in Congress that they can have their health care law, but they cannot keep lying about it. A tax is a tax and they are liars if they call it anything else. And they just stuck the crippled American taxpayer with one of the biggest, broadest, most regressive tax-hikes in history — and during a deep recession!
Finally, Justice Roberts turned to the bumbling, tongue-twisted and goofball opposition party — sometimes called the “Republican” party but usually called the “stupid” or “slow” party — and told them to man up, quit whining and fix the horrific mess that they are so much responsible for. They may have messed their diaper, but he’s not changing it for them.
OK, fine, maybe Republicans didn’t vote for Obamacare. Woo-hoo! And that got us, well, Obamacare anyway.
Yes, Republicans are nearly equally responsible for Obamacare because they set the stage perfectly for Mr. Obama’s unquestioned ascent to the White House and handed his kleptocrats complete control of Congress for the first two years of the Great Taxus Interegnum.
All we can do now is work hard to get conservative Republicans elected in November who will overturn this law and keep the pressure on them to get it done. Let’s not forget, Taxmaggedon is coming, too. If you think the economy is bad now, just wait and see what things look like if President Obama wins a second term and Democrats retain control of the Senate.
Oh, and for all of you who don’t believe President Obama lied about raising taxes, watch this video.

The tax beast is never satisfied! Marxism lives in the WH!
Hot debate. What do you think?
12
What would happen if about a couple million or so unarmed American citizens marched on the WH, the supreme Court and the Congress and just tossed all those deviates out into the street?
Would the military bring in tanks and gunships and attack unarmed citizens?
Would the Washington Police shoot down unarmed citizens?
Would the Secret Service, the ATF, The FBI, the CIA all fire on unarmed citizens?
You can be damned sure they would. They all support and obey a rogue government that fears its people and would slaughter unarmed citizens by the millions to stay in power.
Wake up folks… your life and future means nothing to those inside the beltline.
Hot debate. What do you think?
11
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
4
Lighten up, my friend. Get a sense of humor. I gave Bob one of those thumbs ups, and I’ve thumbed you up, too. I don’t think Bob was exactly calling for a D-Day invasion of Washington. He was speculating on what the gov’t would do if a few million p!ssed off citizens walked into our most important gov’t offices and threw the occupants out onto the streets. No violence – just throw their behinds out onto the streets. (I confess – I’d love to lead the charge. And many people in many other countries would love to do same). And I think Bob’s right – the Gov’t would open up on the citizens.
I would love to throw Pelosi’s and Dear Leader’s behinds out, and Reid and Chuckles Schumer …….
Hot debate. What do you think?
9
uh – we actually have constitutional ways to deal with the idiots.
Hot debate. What do you think?
3
And that has been working out well.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1
I guess you weren’t around this week for the latest 3 Supreme Court decisions.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1
I see you have the long vision, the big picture.
Like or Dislike:
1
And their friends in the media would be cheering and waving their pompoms for them.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1
George Will has lost most of his credibility (not just because of this particular stance, but many foolish stances before it). Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, and Mark Levin make George Will look like a child.
Hot debate. What do you think?
9
i trust Will about as much as I trust a snake. he maintains his bonafides enuf to keep people roped in, and then stabs people in the back when push comes to shove.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
1
I do have honest questions about why Justice Roberts redefined the mandate and then upheld it. Having said that, I want to link to a post that makes a compelling case for why he did ruled the way he did. It’s worth reading and considering.
http://www.sentryjournal.com/2012/06/30/john-roberts-missing-the-mark-or-right-on-target/
Hot debate. What do you think?
2
LD, this is a counter to John’s argument that I posted over there.
I liked your take on the issue and I agree with part of it. But now, we as a Nation must deal not only with the immediate ramifications of the ruling upholding statute but a much bigger issue of precedent. Now, with this set firmly into opinion, there is no limit to what any administration, left or right, crafts in legislation to tax you for not acting on. There is nothing short of a Constitutional Amendment that can preclude this from taking place and if normal congressional activity is an indicator, this will be done over and over again in a less than above board manner manifesting itself as “earmarks” or “attachments” in Bills that have no linkage or worse yet, in a regulatory manner. We do need government, albeit a small one; and its essence of sustenance, monies from tax on the American people is completely within the powers of Congress to levy and is appropriate. But how would a Constitutional Amendment read for it to pass? What limits would be imposed as to strike the right balance? Can that be left up to our representatives? Will this unique ruling necessitate a Constitutional Congress in the future opening the door for, (God forbid) Constitutional Progressivism?
It’s definitely a tough call, John, but to me if your thesis is correct, this is a short term gain for a long term agony of never ending behavioral control via taxation that the American people may never be able to rectify and I differ in that it wasn’t worth it.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1
[...] Linked at The Lonely Conservative – thank you Karen! // tweetmeme_style = 'compact';tweetmeme_url='http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2012/06/obamacare-taxes-and-where-to-find-them-in-the-law/';Tags: Americans for Tax Reform, Bush Tax Cuts, ObamaCare, Taxes, Taxpayers [...]
Like or Dislike:
1