Politico reported that Democrats are employing “trackers” to not only follow Republican congressmen and candidates around on the campaign trail, but to also stalk the candidates at their homes. They take videos of these candidates homes and post them online. Some of them have even been found hiding in bushes. The Democrats defend the creepy practice as just another class warfare tactic.
While most serious campaigns on both sides use campaign trackers — staffers whose job is to record on video every public appearance and statement by an opponent — House Democrats are taking it to another level. They’re now recording video of the homes of GOP congressmen and candidates and posting the raw footage on the Internet for all to see.
That ratcheting up of the video surveillance game is unnerving Republicans who insist that even by political standards, it’s a gross invasion of privacy. Worse, they say, it creates a safety risk for members of Congress and their families at a time when they are already on edge after a deranged gunman shot former Arizona Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords 18 months ago.
Wisconsin GOP Rep. Reid Ribble, who said he’s also been followed by a cameraman when shopping for groceries, said the home videos cross a line. (Read More)
These Democrats are worse than internet trolls. They have no shame.

Well placed 38 between their eyes will produce the desired result. Bring it community organizer. Millions of us are ready for the civil war you want.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
That’s why they want our guns. It’s the only reason they are afraid of us. Once those are gone we are totally screwed.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
imo, the next civil war can’t happen too soon. Many of us will be fighting for our independence from the petty tyrants and fascists who have woven themselves into the fabric of the nation.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
To me, this is the “double edged sword” that exists in a free society. Agreed, that those that do this have no shame, empathy or civility, especially bringing family into it, LC, but if they’re legally doing this, I have no problem with it and consider them freelance political paparazzi. IMO, what I saw on the video post wasn’t incriminating in the least. If they’re on private property they need to be asked to leave and if they don’t, have the authorities handle it. It’s just an annoyance that people that choose to be in the public eye must put up with to an extent. We have stalking and trespass laws and they need to be enforced. If you truly think your life is endangered there are many states have concealed weapons licensing as well; here in Michigan we are now allowed to be licensed to concealed carry a Tazer.
Just as we rail against police arresting individuals or confiscating their property without warrant or Alec Baldwin physically assaulting citizens on public property when legally recording them, this is a liberty that needs not be trumped by “safety”, because “safety” can mean anything to The Ruling Class. For now, we’d better legally fight fire with fire.
Like or Dislike:
1
“Well placed 38 between their eyes will produce the desired result. Bring it community organizer. Millions of us are ready for the civil war you want.”
The people of the United States should put every single one of our elected dirt bag politicians and their challengers under 24 hour armed surveillance. They are the ones who will have the targets between their eyes in the upcoming civil war jcoff mentioned.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5