Attorney General Eric Holder believes the laws he is supposed to uphold are for others to follow. Well, not everyone, as we all know, but I digress. Holder’s wife is the part owner of an abortion clinic, but for some reason he never saw fit to disclose this information. Gee, I wonder why.
The revelations about Attorney General Eric Holder and his connection to an abortion clinic are becoming worse as new information has come to light showing he failed to disclose his wife’s co-owning of an abortion business.
Just before the election, Human Events broke the news that Holder’s wife and sister-in-law co-own, through a family trust, own the building where a controversial abortion practitioner operates. The Holder family transferred ownership to a family trust in 2009, eight months after President Barack Obama’s inauguration and a deed names Holder’s wife and sister-in-law as trustees.
Fulton County tax records show Holder’s wife and sister-in-law own the building, located at 6210 Old National Highway, College Park, Ga. A statement from the Georgia Department of Law shows the building was home to Old National Gynecology, the practice of abortion practitioner Tyrone Cecil Malloy.
Now, Human Events has an update, revealing that Holder failed to disclose his wife’s ownership of the building. The attorney general’s financial disclosure reports for 2008 through 2011 show Holder neglected to report his wife’s co-ownership. (Read More)
Via Fox Nation
@lonelycon And these types want us to ‘reach across the aisle”? Be united with their junk?
Like or Dislike:
1
To be honest, it seems that there is less than meets the eye to this story. While it is morally repugnant to have an abortion clinic as a tenant, this is still not the same as owning a clinic. Then there is the issue that it is in a family trust, so she may or may not have that much control or knowledge of the situation. Not saying that there is nothing to the story, only that what was reported does not support the headline.
Like or Dislike:
0
Should I change the headline to make it more fair to Holder? Does the media ever do that for Republicans? Ever?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
@lonelycon Wow! No wonder the big push on Liberal Abortion!
Like or Dislike:
0
I disagree, John. I think there’s much more to it than meets the eye. Why–of all the investments they must have in the trust–was THIS one not mentioned? I think there’s more to come.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
@ John Scotus
If Romney’s blind trust investment in a Chinese oil company is fair game in a presidential debate, then why should the Holders’ involvement in a similar investment situation be off limits?
In this present political climate I see nothing wrong with this L.C.’s headline. I would add, the USAG has the power to prosecute any violations to the federal law, regarding abortion rights, by the individual states. That fact alone constitutes a clear conflict of interest.
Oh, and by the way, the Fulton County Board of Assessors lists both Holder’s wife and his sister-in-law on the deed as co-owners.
Like or Dislike:
3