San Bernardino, California is a case study in how not to run cities. The main takeaway from this story is not to elect Democrats (or any politicians) who are beholden to the unions. It would be funny if it weren’t so serious. The story is like one of those awful movies where you know what’s going to happen, and you wonder why they make the characters so stupid because anyone with half a brain could have seen it coming.
When this sun-drenched exurb east of Los Angeles filed for bankruptcy protection in August, the city attorney suggested fraudulent accounting was the root of the problem.
The mayor blamed a dysfunctional city council and greedy police and fire unions. The unions blamed the mayor. Even now, there is little agreement on how the city got into this crisis or how it can extricate itself.
“It’s total political chaos,” said John Husing, a former San Bernardino resident and regional economist. “There is no solution. They’ll never fix anything.”
Yet on close examination, the city’s decades-long journey from prosperous, middle-class community to bankrupt, crime-ridden, foreclosure-blighted basket case is straightforward — and alarmingly similar to the path traveled by many municipalities around America’s largest state. San Bernardino succumbed to a vicious circle of self-interests among city workers, local politicians and state pension overseers.
Little by little, over many years, the salaries and retirement benefits of San Bernardino’s city workers — and especially its police and firemen — grew richer and richer, even as the city lost its major employers and gradually got poorer and poorer.
Read the whole thing, and share it, if for no other reason than to try to prevent it from happening elsewhere. Oh wait, it already is, in cities all over the USA. The same cities that tilted the election to Obama.


I think unions have worn out their welcome. They have turned greedy and only support their self interest and are the money laundering organization for the Democratic Party. Look at Hostess. They would rather put 18,500 employees out of work than to take an 8% pay reduction to keep the company financially stable. What is the union going to help those people out to find new jobs or to pay them money to carry them over? How much you guess they will give these employees the middle finger and tell them to go on unemployment (our dime). There needs to be a law that prevents unions from having so much power. If unions go on strike they would be responsible for paying the strikers their full time salary plus benefits. This might make them think before going on strike. Our economy is tanking and these unions think companies are rich. I hate to tell them that I am not going to pay $10 for a Twinkie. This is why we have so much Chinese products in the US. Our own companies can produce products because of unions and federal regulations.
Like or Dislike:
2