Are there any elected Republicans out there willing to look into this? Seriously, this is alarming. I know cities turn out the vote for Democrats, but really, 100% of the vote went to Obama in all of these places?
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Mitt Romney on Tuesday received ZERO votes in 59 Philadelphia voting divisions! ZERO! …
Most big cities are politically homogeneous, with 75 percent to 80 percent of voters identifying as Democrats.
As you might imagine, this is impossible.
But don’t try to tell liberal media members that voter fraud is real. (Read More)
Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote. Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County. There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won. But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory. And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw - large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama. However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre. Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas? In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less. Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there. Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?
Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them.
But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation.
Maybe there is some rational explanation for the numbers that you are about to see. If there is, I would really love to hear it.
What makes all of this even more alarming is that there were reports of voting machine problems during early voting in Ohio. It was being reported that some voters were claiming that they tried to vote for Romney but that the voting machines kept recording their votes as votes for Obama… (Read More)
Then look at what happened to Allen West in Florida. He was ahead in St. Lucie County, then he was magically behind yet they only did a partial recount of the ballots. Why not a full recount?
During early voting in Colorado, votes for Romney were being switched to votes for Obama. The same thing happened in Florida and North Carolina. But the media chose to focus on one instance where a vote was changed from Obama to Romney. I wouldn’t be surprised if that was just a head fake so the Dems could say “It happened to us, too.”
I just heard again that the number of total votes for Obama was down this year over 2008, but in these places he received 99 to 100% of the vote? Where else did this happen and why isn’t anyone investigating this? Click here to find out how to contact your congresscritters and demand they launch an investigation immediately.
Is no one going to do anything?
Where are our elected officials? Must we storm Capitol Hill and wake up our representatives? Are they going to force us to turn to mob rule? I’m ready.
I’m reading about massive voter fraud and I’m not reading one word about anyone in the Republican party willing to do one thing about it.
They aren’t even talking about it. Where’s Reince Preibus? Where are Romney’s campaign people? Where are John Boehner and Mitch McConnell? Where is the media? Scratch that last question. We all know where they stand.
Update 2: Rachel Alexander at Townhall has more on Ohio:
So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio’s Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio’s 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.
The inflated numbers can’t just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by.
Also, in Florida there were more ballots cast than voters. If not for Allen West we might not be hearing about this. Maybe a full recount of that entire state is in order.
Update: Of course the left is still saying voter fraud doesn’t exist, even though some of them have already admitted that it does.
Update: Linked by YouViewed/Editorial where it is noted that CNN sent a reporter to a place in Texas where Obama only got 3.4% of the vote, but they aren’t paying attention to any of this.