President Obama wants tax hikes. Speaker of the House John Boehner should give him these tax hikes, like, now!
So if Boehner and his team are going to put some tax increases on the table, perhaps by eliminating deductions more than raising rates, they should learn from past mistakes a drive a truly hard bargain. Make the spending cuts immediate, not a load of cold porridge about $X of cuts happening over ten years, eight of which will never come. The opening bid should be small revenue increases for big fiscal restraint, something on the scale of giving Obama his silly “Buffett Rule” millionaire surtax in exchange for a balanced budget.
And let’s hope the Speaker and the rest of the Republican negotiators are smart enough to propose revenue increases that will hurt liberals the most. Start by taxing the ever-loving crap out of Hollywood. I’ve suggested this before, and the esteemed Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds, was on the same wavelength last August when he suggested bringing back the 20 percent excise tax on motion picture gross revenue from the 1950s.
“The movie excise tax was imposed in response to the high deficits after World War Two,” Reynolds recalled. ”Deficits are high again, and there’s already historical precedent. Of course, to keep up with technology, the tax should now apply to DVDs, downloadable movies, pay-per-view and the like. But in these financially perilous times, why should movie stars and studio moguls, with their yachts, swimming pools and private jets, not at least shoulder the burden they carried back in Harry Truman’s day – when, to be honest, movies were better anyway.”
As Reynolds noted, one side effect of such proposals is that it causes far-Left Hollywood types to suddenly begin babbling about the depressing effects of high tax rates upon economic growth, as though they had been suddenly possessed by the ghost of Milton Friedman. That’s fun even if the tax proposals end up getting defeated. Especially now that we have YouTube to disseminate and immortalize their panicked bursts of “trickle-down economic” wisdom.
Reynolds had other suggestions for revenue proposals – many of them involving the elimination of deductions, which seems to be the spirit in Washington at the moment – that would hurt blue state political machines and liberal institutions the most. (Read More)
William Jacobson is on board, even though like myself, he resides in a blue state. (Actually, two blue states, but whose counting?)
I want you to tax the crap out of the blue states in which I live because I put country ahead of personal fortune. Not because I want to hear my tax-loving liberal neighbors squeal like stuck pigs. I’m better than that.
I’m not. I want to hear my liberal friends whine about the taxes increases so I can say “Told you so.” Hey, we may go broke right along with them, but at least we’ll have seen it coming.
Not that I expect Boehner to outsmart Obama.
Via Doug Ross


Scott Walker for Speaker of the House
By JEFFREY LORD
American Spectator
Quote-
“It’s time for a change: a Reagan, not a Ford should lead the House GOP.”
Enough. Enough. Enough.
It’s time for conservatives to challenge John Boehner for Speaker of the House.
Fear smells. And conservatives across the land are smelling the political fear emanating from the Speaker’s office.
“The House of Representatives shall chose their Speaker and other Officers.”
– Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution
The U.S. Constitution makes it plain in Article I, Section 2. The Speaker of the House of Representatives does not have to be a member of the House.
Like or Dislike:
1
The so-called Obama mandate for higher taxes is simply underwelming. The forty-seven percent, who pay no or little taxes, want the one percent to shoulder more of the burden. More taxation for ye, but not for me. It is winning politics, but lousy economics. Then Obama most likely doesn’t even keep his own score in golf.
Like or Dislike:
1
Except studios could still get around higher taxes with “Hollywood Accounting”
(copy and paste from the original article):
“Here’s a basic example of Hollywood Accounting: A studio makes a movie. The studio distributes the movie itself, and although the distributor is technically a separate company, they both belong to the same parent company. Also, the distribution arm sets whatever fees it wants. If they want to charge themselves eleventy quintillion dollars for distribution, they totally can. Then, even if the film earns billions of dollars in box office receipts, they’re still technically in debt (to themselves) and thus haven’t turned a profit (at least on paper).
Sound ridiculous? It happens all the freaking time. David Prowse, the guy who was in the Darth Vader costume in the original trilogy of Star Wars has never been paid for Return of the Jedi because it hasn’t turned a profit after nearly 30 years. That’s after dozens of home video and theatrical re-releases. (All the merchandising money goes to Lucas directly, of course.)
Similarly, someone leaked Warner Bros.’ accounting sheet for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix onto the internet, showing that the film that had grossed about $1 billion worldwide, but had lost $167 million on paper.
Winston Groom, the writer of Forrest Gump was told that the film based on his work wasn’t profitable. Of course, he got the last laugh when they came to him asking if they could turn the sequel, Gump and Co. into a film as well, and he reportedly told them, ”I cannot, in good conscience, allow money to be wasted on a failure.”
And then there’s Art Buchwald, whose spec script got stolen by Paramount, and got turned into Coming to America. When he took them to court and sued for a percentage of the profit, Paramount was totally cool with it, because according to their books, it hadn’t made any kind of profit, so they didn’t owe him one red cent. The judge later ruled that it was “unconscionable” for Paramount not to pay Buchwald something in a settlement. Otherwise, he’d have to ask Paramount to open their books for the courts to review. Paramount quickly backed down and settled with Buchwald instead.”
Like or Dislike:
2
How can Boehner out smart Obama. He doesn’t have booku czars holding his hand.
Like or Dislike:
0