Marc Thiessen argues in his latest Washington Post piece that conservatives should let us go over the fiscal cliff, so the people will finally be forced to pay for the government they voted for.
Barring a last-minute breakthrough, taxes will go up for every American taxpayer on Jan. 1 — and that’s a development conservatives should welcome.
Don’t get me wrong, it would be better not to raise taxes on anyone, pursue pro-growth tax reform and cut the size of government instead. But that’s not what the American people voted to do last month. Americans cast their ballots for big government.
Now it’s time to pay for it.
Until now, the growth of government under President Obama has not hit the pocketbooks of most Americans. During Obama’s first term, federal spending grew to more than 24 percent of GDP — the highest it has been since 1946. Yet almost no one in the country (except smokers and those who frequent indoor tanning salons) saw their taxes rise. Quite the opposite: 160 million Americans saw their payroll taxes reduced from 6.2 to 4.2 percent.
How can we expect people to care about the growth of government if it doesn’t cost them anything?
Read the whole thing. I can’t say I disagree. People are clueless about how much this government they’ve given us is costing. If it hits them all in the wallet maybe they’ll wake up and see the light. Unfortunately, those of us who didn’t vote for this will also be forced to pay the price, but we will be paying for it one way or the other. May as well get it over with so there’s a chance to possibly preserve something for future generations, who had absolutely no say in what we’re doing to them.
Marcus Ebenhack made a similar argument in an American Thinker article.
Please explain why John Boehner, or any other responsible conservative will not step in front of a gaggle of reporters and say quite simply, “If you want the kind of government President Obama and his party want to deliver then be prepared to allow them to skim about half of your paycheck off the top. It doesn’t matter how much money you make! If you have a job, you will pay.”
Big government is not paid for by the rich. There simply are not enough of them. Ask any European. Their tax code is very non-progressive, as opposed to ours. Everybody pays. The lions share falls to the middle class and working poor, because that’s where the real money is. Not because we have so much, rather that there are so many of us. Many among us seem to think we want a big government entitlement state. But that’s only because we’ve never had to pay for it. How do you think a country amasses a 16 trillion dollar debt? (Read More)
Instead we’re hearing about some “small deal” that will just kick the can down the road, again. On that, Obama is going to “demand” an up or down vote in both houses of congress, because he thinks he’s a king or something.


@lonelycon I did not vote for this cash guzzler
Like or Dislike:
2
The simple fact is that the tax system has been distorted and pimped by Democrats, such that a large percentage of Americans pay NO Federal income tax. That cannot continue, for two reasons.
First, the current tax system rapes high income producers – the very engine driving our economy.
Second, the system is not designed to make taxpayers actually … oh, I don’t know … PAY FOR WHAT THEY WANT. Once Americans are forced to pay for their goodies, we will see an IMMEDIATE change in how we view government largesse.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
“People are clueless about how much this government they’ve given us is costing.”
All this was also true in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Yet, you right-wing cheats insisted on cutting revenue. You know, some guy at the CATO Institute, yeah, CATO, William Niskanen, demonstrated years ago that not only was starve the beast ineffective, it was counter-productive: The relationship between spending and taxes is inverse, not direct–that is, reducing taxes increases spending.
Of course, he got drummed out of movement conservatism because you frauds thought all you had to was cut taxes and research undercut your delusions.
Like or Dislike:
1
The root conservative position has always been for financial responsibility. Before the 1980s, this often meant higher taxes. I’m not as hostile to the idea of higher taxes as most conservatives, but I’m still not sure that this is the answer. It would help if, instead of just wanting to raise taxes, there was actually a deal on the table to take care of the budget mess. But that is not going to happen.
How did it come to this that we have ended up with such a dysfunctional government and political system–including both major parties?
Like or Dislike:
1
Three words solve this problem.
“Balance the budget.”
Neither party has the willpower to do it.
Like or Dislike:
2
Don’t just blame the Democrats! That 47% of Americans pay no federal income taxes is due to the 2001/2003 tax rates passed by a Congress controlled by Republicans and signed into law by President George W Bush. Those rates were then extended during the lame-duck session of the eleventy-first Congress, and signed into law by President Barack Hussein Obama.
At least the Republicans want to spend less than the Democrats, but spending increased plenty during the Bush Administration; it just didn’t increase as much until the Democrats took control of the Congress during President Bush’s last two years.
Like or Dislike:
1
[...] The Lonely Conservative: Should The People Pay For The Government They Voted For? [...]
Like or Dislike:
0