Yesterday a Michigan lawmaker declared “There will be blood” in response to the passage of right-to-work laws in the state. White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked if the administration condemns such a remark, and Carney refused to do so, saying it was open to interpretation.
“The president believes in debate that’s civil,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said today. “I haven’t seen those comments and I’m not sure that they mean what some would interpret them to mean. I just haven’t seen them.”
What part of “There will be blood” is open to interpretation?
By remaining silent on the violence and threats of violence in Michigan the White House is condoning violence.
New MotherF_cking Tone! Civility!
Like or Dislike:
2
Funny, the WH wants to weigh in on how the states should handle their own business, but doesn’t want to condemn stupid comments by people from the admin’s own party…
Like or Dislike:
3
Carney is a soul-less hack.
Like or Dislike:
3
Oh, but remember, my fellow conservatives, the commies (oops….I mean the liberals) say WE are the ones who are full of hate. What a piece of B.S.
Like or Dislike:
3
Should a conservative utter a phrase such as there will be blood or somebody has to pay, the White House would immediately call out the National Guard.
Like or Dislike:
2
Wait, Spokeskid Carney played stupid yet again to benefit the Obama Administration? The Devil, you say!
You watch, Obama or Carney or someone representing the Administration will speak ill of Crowder’s comments, and there will NOT be blood (or questions) from the media on the blatant hypocrisy …
Remember the crap Palin got for marks on a freaking map? And these comments, and earlier ones, result in the lovely sound of crickets.
Ah, but for Double Standards, the Left would have no Standards at all!
Thanks for posting!
Like or Dislike:
2
I have to admire the pure unadulterated chutzpa of Mr. Carney . He lies with no concern for God , honor , or hell.
Like or Dislike:
2
And yet, all she has to say is “My name is Sarah Palin” and it’s immediately violent hate speech, right? Between the president inserting himself in a state issue (bellowing around Michigan about the idea of right-to-work, which is not a Federal issue) and betwix this moron pronouncing “There will be blood!”, union violence is a no-brainer kinda follow-on, no? Once again Team Democrat stirring up and dividing and encouraging physical altercations rather than civil disagreement.
Like or Dislike:
1