Former regulatory czar and longtime advocate of a second Bill of Rights Cass Sunstein is feeling pretty good about the prospect of President Obama making his dream come true.
Sunstein located the source of Obama’s inspiration in Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1944State of the Union address, rather than the South African constitution–though the American academics whose writings inspired South Africa’s ambitious Bill of Rights could well have taken Roosevelt’s proposals as their foundation.
Roosevelt’s Second Bill of Rights–not a list of constitutional amendments, but policy goals–was as follows:
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.
Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
Sunstein points out Roosevelt was not a socialist–and yet many of the “rights” he proposed were inspired by socialist policies. The Soviet constitution of 1936, too, included the right to work, among other guarantees.
In addition, Sunstein argues that Obama has made progress on least one of these rights: the right to health care… (Read More)
Of course people like Cass Sunstein always fail to mention that in order to grant these “rights” they must impinge on the rights of others.
Update: Linked by The Pirate’s Cove, who has a photo of chicks with big guns. Seriously.


Our Founders would have formed a line to punch this guy in the nose.
Like or Dislike:
3
I think he would have been tarred and feathered.
Like or Dislike:
2
[...] blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on a leftist 2nd Bill of [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
These all sound like a lot of whining and blaming to me since we have the freedom to do all those things on our own. So what if life isn’t completely fair. Nobody ever said it was! Nobody owes us any of those things. How about the “Bill of Responsibilities”. Seems that would be more fair for everybody since it appears a lot of people need to take more of those.
Like or Dislike:
2
The right to a good education makes sense. The right to food also makes sense. No one should starve in his day and age. The right to a decent home? Bullshit. Not everyone deserves a home, or can maintain one.
If you f***ed up on your own accord, the no, you don’t have any right for secruity in your old age. You reap what you sow.
The right to health is wishy washy. Any illnesses that are life threatening or cut the lifespan by more than a certain amount of time… and we’re not caused by carelessness on part of the person (reasonably), should be taken care of. No one should die on the streets, or be f***ed over by an illness that wasn’t their fault.
But, we already have safety nets for that. The problem is, they’re catching people who’ve gotten cancer from abusing cigs, and shit like that. Let’em die from their own stupidity. We’d be better off.
Like or Dislike:
0