Federal Appeals Court Finds Obama Recess Appointments Unconstitutional

A federal appeals court has found the “recess” NLRB appointments made by President Obama when the Senate wasn’t technically recessed to be unconstitutional. Not that he’s one to care about such trivial matters, especially when it comes to stacking the labor board with Big Labor’s stooges.

A federal appeals court has ruled that President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate to fill vacancies on a labor relations panel.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit says Obama did not have the power to make recess appointments earlier this year to the National Labor Relations Board. (Read More)

The administration is going to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

Update: The Washington Times has more on the decision, and how the judges found that Obama abused his power.

In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess.

The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments Mr. Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and the board no longer has a quorum to operate.

But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance, with the judges arguing that the president’s recess appointment powers don’t apply to “intrasession” appointments — those made when Congress has left town for a few days or weeks.

The judges signaled the power only applies after Congress has adjourned sine die, which is a legislative term of art that signals the end to a long work period. In modern times, it means the president could only use his powers when Congress quits business at the end of a year.

Read the whole thing.