After releasing letters from children pleading for more gun control, President Obama came out and signed his 23 executive actions. These actions will cost the taxpayers billions of dollars, because he can’t seem to do anything that isn’t costly. (And ineffective.)
President Obama and Vice President Biden revealed their proposed reforms intended to reduce firearms related violence.
The proposal contains a mix of executive actions, regulations, and calls for Congress to act legislatively. The total package will cost at least $4.5 billion in new spending. (Read More)
They barely addressed the violence portrayed in movies, television shows and video games. They wouldn’t want to upset their liberal pals in Hollywood. Oh, and he also didn’t instruct his Attorney General to prevent agencies from allowing assault weapons to be sold to Mexican drug cartels. Maybe that was implied.
Update: I almost forgot to mention how one of his plans is to have doctors act as gun investigators. So not only will they essentially work for the state thanks to Obamacare, they’re now being asked to become police of the state.
The argument in England was that Now that we have The Police, nobody needs to be armed for self defense. Hey folks. A self appointed aristocracy set itself up and proceeded to disarm the public, by stealth tactics – nobody reading bills, objections summarily dismissed with platitudes, the usual lying with statistics. They get away with it here for the same reasons.
It is now clear that what Feinstein wants is the same as what the Brits have been doing since about 1902, and she believes the same “philosophy”. Nadler’s statement that he believes “the state should have the monopoly on use of force” is that philosophy. It overthrows popular sovereignty and replaces it with aristocratic sovereignty. Obviously Bloomberg buys it, and so does Schumer. Cuomo just implements it. Frankly I am less concerned with their ideas than their tactics and strategies. We need to know where politicians stand on Nadler’s statement, and why and where do they get this unconstitutional garbage from. Force the issue. Don’t be a day late and a dollar short.
Like or Dislike:
1
The House of Lords figured it out in 1902 – long before Frankfurt, and long before Alinsky. In fact, it is more adapted to take advantage of weaknesses in this form of government. Joyce Lee Malcolm quotes them by name. Unfortunately there is no further info on their associations or ‘philosophy’ – like whether they were fabians, or in that clique – i forget what brits call them – ‘the xxxx set’ . This is what makes them Effective Subversives – they know the system and how to play it.
Like or Dislike:
1
obama can sign as many XO’s as he want. it means nothing. in the end, the only thing that will work to stop these unconstitutional sewer rats, is an armed rebellion. sound familiar? a couple hundred thousand NRA members showing up at the white house would be a good start. never let a crisis go to waste ya’ say…obama’s crisis would be a trouser full of his own waste. it is time to let these gun grabbers know we mean business.
Like or Dislike:
0