It’s about time. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will finally talk to Congress about the terrorist attack on our consulate Benghazi that left four Americans dead, including a US Ambassador. She’s going to have a lot to answer for.
Congressional investigators have pieced together a series of decisions that led State Department officials to inexplicably draw down security in Libya last year even as threats and attacks against Western diplomats were rising in the violent, chaotic city of Benghazi where America’s ambassador was killed last Sept. 11.
The investigators have determined that between May and September, the department reduced the number of Mobile Security Deployment teams from three to one, thinning the potential U.S. security officers available to protect diplomats by at least twelve, the Washington Guardian has learned.
In addition, the lone remaining six-member Mobile Security Team in Libya at the time Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed was detailed primarily to training Libyan security officials rather than providing force protection to U.S. officials, the sources told the Washington Guardian.
Read the whole thing. Ambassador Stevens sent Clinton a cable on the morning of the attack outlining how perilous the security situation had become, so it isn’t like nobody in the administration was aware of what was happening. But that didn’t stop them from blaming the attack on an obscure film and jailing the filmmaker. Hopefully Clinton won’t invoke the “sloppiness” defense.
Then there are questions about who supplied the arms to the attackers, and other allegations, that I doubt will be answered today.
Update: I missed most of the hearing because of work, but there are already plenty of headlines, and there was plenty of drama. Via Drudge:
Shouts: 'What Difference ... Does It Make?!'
Disses Rice: 'I Wasn't Involved In Talking Points'...
NYT: Some Algeria Attackers Hit US Embassy in Libya...
SecState: I never saw requests for more security...
Blames Congress for lack of funding...
Rand Paul: 'I would have relieved you of post'...
Dem Sen brings up WMD's in Iraq...



True to media bias, CBS This Morning’s headline was “Republicans demand answers from Clinton.” Just where are the Democrats on this and why aren’t they demanding answers? ALL Americans should demand the truth be uncovered.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
The article cited above went on the report that the Democrats will use the time blaming the whole thing on Republicans.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
4
@lonelycon thing again . they will softball her.
Like or Dislike:
2
@tiny5200 @lonelycon ok .ok.ok. i know i goofed “think”
Like or Dislike:
0
I doubt that Queen Clinton will have to answer any really hard questions. It would make for some really good theater to actually hear the truth but that will NEVER happen. Period. It would mean owning up to the total incompetence of this “terribly smart” woman.
Four Americans are dead and the press yawns. It is depressing.
The dims aren’t interested. They are only interested in retaining power, not in what is best for our country. That takes people who are able to rise above the fray. The dims ARE the fray.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
[...] Clinton Will Be Questioned About Benghazi – Lonely Conservative [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
Would be nice to have the concession on Nerf Balls and cotton balls supplying the Senate.
Like or Dislike:
1
Hillary Clinton was the one who reduced her itemized budgeting for diplomatic building fortification and use of a private army of security contractors in Libya, not Congress. She took away money from European operations also. But she was happy to fund global climate change and green energy initiatives abroad. Barry and Hillary facilitated the Arab Revolution for the conquest, drug networks, and OPEC to cement a war in perpetuity.
Her husband’s administration treated terrorist events as criminal crime and hid behind ongoing FBI investigations to stall, obfuscate, and deny. All the lessons learned from the 9-11 Commission Hearings are erased it seems.
Like or Dislike:
3
One of my readers posted this comment on a post I have today about the hearings (politics is a topic I rarely go to, but this hearing so incensed me that I had to):
From reader 65andcounting, Clinton’s comment that got his/her goat:
“It is less important today as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice and maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.”
Like or Dislike:
3
Congressional Testimony 10-09-2012 on Libya 9-11 attack revealed the State Department at that time was sitting on $2.2 BILLION approved funds to be used for U.S. Embassy and Consulate SECURITY Worldwide.
Like or Dislike:
1