NRO put together this video montage comparing Leslie Stahl’s tough interview of House majority leader Eric Cantor with Steve Croft’s puff ball interview of President Obama and Hillary Clinton on 60 Minutes. The difference in how they were treated couldn’t be more stark.
Kroft asked questions such as, “Why did you want to do this together, a joint interview?” and “Why were you so insistent about wanting her to be secretary of state?” Kroft asked not a single follow-up question, even when the president made implausible assertions such as, “when it comes to Egypt, I think, had it not been for the leadership we showed, you might have seen a different outcome there.” This, by the way, as Muslim Brotherhood snipers gunned down protesters from the rooftops in Cairo.
Cantor, on the other hand, was challenged at every turn. He fielded questions such as, “Why go through this brinksmanship, gamesmanship, one-upsmanship? Explain it. Maybe there’s a real good answer,” and “Congress has a 9 percent approval rating. What do you think this conveys about confidence in our government? Don’t you think this is shredding that?” Stahl challenged Cantor on his assertion that he is willing to compromise with the president on fiscal issues: “Okay, but what about revenues? A compromise. You wanted the spending cuts, they wanted revenues,” and, later in the interview, offered, “But revenues reduce the deficit.” (Read More)
The way the media treats Obama is downright embarrassing and they ought to be ashamed of themselves.


I’m so riled about the media that I am about to burst. What can we possibly do as citizens to right all the media wrongs? There must be something.
Like or Dislike:
3
This will NOT change until the Dems doublecross the lefty press. It’s NOT a matter of IF but WHEN. Freedom of speach is usually the last to go before tyranny takes total control.
Like or Dislike:
3
Barry Carter and Zbigniew Warren Madeleine Clinton, again, have used the students to initiate protests that are then taken over by radical-islamist revolutionaries, armed and financed by the U.S., who proceed to slaughter and violate the human rights of women and children, Christians and Jews, students, and other minorities. Their “independent accountability review board” of administration acolytes Pickering and Mullen is not acceptable. The obfuscated misinformation and scapegoating by both, her delayed lack of testimony, false accusations of budget underfunding, inaccessibility to the thirty survivors of Benghazi, misuse of USAID funds for weapon running, cover-up of the mission, and lies to the victims’ families is unacceptable. Abandoning our personnel is unacceptable. Dereliction of duty is punishable. Both are obligated to explain to Americans why they promulgated the Arab Revolution by using Wikileaks and the Alliance of Youth Movements to overthrow our allied governments; what the interests and mission in Africa really are now that we have been inserted into a war in perpetuity; why human rights of the minorities have been suspended since the purging of Western friendly military; who is profiting off the pillaging and plundering of the ME and Africa. That is the basic type of information an unsubsidized, watchdog Fourth Estate would go after.
Like or Dislike:
1
and KERRY is going to sail right into the State Dept, with nary a peep from our side.
Like or Dislike:
1
[...] Media Malpractice Exposed: Video: A Tale Of Two 60 Minutes Interviews [...]
Like or Dislike:
1