Attorney General Eric Holder finally responded to Senator Rand Paul’s question on whether President Obama believes he has the authority to order a drone strike on an American citizen on US soil. You’re not going to like his answer.
“It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” Holder replied in a letter yesterday to Paul’s question about whether Obama “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.”
Paul condemned the idea. “The U.S. Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening – it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans,” he said in a statement. (Read More)
Related: States and localities can and should craft laws about drone use and set limits on it. I’m not sure what that would do about a tyrannical federal government, though. Also, Nancy Pelosi said that Obama could kill an American with a drone strike and keep it secret.


@lonelycon I don’t think he wants to tempt the U.S. Supreme Court.
Like or Dislike:
0
Where are all the leftie civil rights outfits now?!!
Crickets so far….
Like or Dislike:
3
Holder Says Obama Could Order Drone Strike On US Soil | The Lonely Conservative http://t.co/jD989SCNof #Holder #Obama Drones #tcot
Like or Dislike:
0
If a Bush, Any Bush had done half of what Obozo has done the Press would have had him hung drawn and quartered
what bothers me is the lefties saying don’t worry it will never happen
Like or Dislike:
2
And, now Mc Cain & Graham are on the floor of the Senate dressing down Rand Paul and acting as a Supreme Tag Team.
Like or Dislike:
0