Time Mag Declares The End Of Men

Time Magazine published a piece by feminist author Hanna Rosen that declares the “end of men,” who Rosen says will soon be obsolete. This is how most of these radical feminists think. Disturbing.

Are men literally obsolete? Of course not, and if we had to prove that we could never win. For one thing, we haven’t figured out a way to harvest sperm without them being, you know, alive. But in order to win this debate we have to prove that men, quote unquote, as we’ve historically come to define them — entitled to power, destined for leadership, arrogant, confused by anything that isn’t them. As in: “I don’t understand. Is it a guy dressed up like a girl? Or a girl dressed up like a guy?” They are obsolete. …

ONE: It’s the end of men because men are failing in the workplace.

TWO: It’s the end of men because the traditional household, propped up by the male breadwinner, is vanishing.

THREE: It’s the end of men because we can see it in the working and middle class.

FOUR: It’s the end of men because men have lost their monopoly on violence and aggression.

FIVE: It’s the end of men because men, too, are now obsessed with their body hair. (Read More)

In all fairness to Time, they did publish a piece by Camille Paglia last month that rebutted in advance this drivel from Rosen.

But the triumphalism among some — like Hanna Rosin in her book, The End of Men, about women’s gains — seems startlingly premature. For instance, Rosin says of the sagging fortunes of today’s working-class couples that they and we had “reached the end of a hundred thousand years of human history and the beginning of a new era, and there was no going back.” This sweeping appeal to history somehow overlooks history’s far darker lessons about the cyclic rise and fall of civilizations, which as they become more complex and interconnected also become more vulnerable to collapse. The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.

After the next inevitable apocalypse, men will be desperately needed again! Oh, sure, there will be the odd gun-toting Amazonian survivalist gal, who can rustle game out of the bush and feed her flock, but most women and children will be expecting men to scrounge for food and water and to defend the home turf. Indeed, men are absolutely indispensable right now, invisible as it is to most feminists, who seem blind to the infrastructure that makes their own work lives possible. It is overwhelmingly men who do the dirty, dangerous work of building roads, pouring concrete, laying bricks, tarring roofs, hanging electric wires, excavating natural gas and sewage lines, cutting and clearing trees, and bulldozing the landscape for housing developments. It is men who heft and weld the giant steel beams that frame our office buildings, and it is men who do the hair-raising work of insetting and sealing the finely tempered plate-glass windows of skyscrapers 50 stories tall. […]

The modern economy, with its vast production and distribution network, is a male epic, in which women have found a productive role — but women were not its author. Surely, modern women are strong enough now to give credit where credit is due! (Read More)

Some modern women are strong enough to give credit where credit is due, but the likes of Rosen and her ilk never will.

Via NewsBusters